R v Dirksen
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Jackson, Leurer and Tholl JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKCA 6 |
| Citation | 2021 SKCA 6 |
| Date | 15 January 2021 |
| Docket Number | CACR3267 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
R v Fast, 2022 ABCA 33
...More relevant in the present situation is what was recently said by the Court in R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6, para 31, 398 CCC (3d) 411, after referring to the general statement in R v Fanjoy, [1985] 2 SCR 233: 31    In R v Trotchie, 2019 SKCA 43, [2019] 10 WWR. 187, Ottenbreit ......
-
R. v. F.I.
...the recent decisions in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [12]              
......
-
R. v. CRAWFORD
...the recent decisions in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [35]              
......
-
R. v. FRIESEN
...The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan in R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6 at para 59, 398 CCC (3d) 411 summed up the purpose of s. [59]     The object of this section is to prevent evidence of a complainant’s past sexual activity from being admitted for an improper reason.......
4 cases
-
R v Fast, 2022 ABCA 33
...More relevant in the present situation is what was recently said by the Court in R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6, para 31, 398 CCC (3d) 411, after referring to the general statement in R v Fanjoy, [1985] 2 SCR 233: 31    In R v Trotchie, 2019 SKCA 43, [2019] 10 WWR. 187, Ottenbreit ......
-
R. v. F.I.
...the recent decisions in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [12]              
......
-
R. v. CRAWFORD
...the recent decisions in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [35]              
......
-
R. v. FRIESEN
...The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan in R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6 at para 59, 398 CCC (3d) 411 summed up the purpose of s. [59]     The object of this section is to prevent evidence of a complainant’s past sexual activity from being admitted for an improper reason.......