R v Dirksen,

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeJackson, Leurer and Tholl JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2021 SKCA 6
Citation2021 SKCA 6
Docket NumberCACR3267
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date15 January 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. F.I.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 8, 2021
    ...the recent decisions in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [12]               ......
  • R v Fast,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 31, 2022
    ...More relevant in the present situation is what was recently said by the Court in R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6, para 31, 398 CCC (3d) 411, after referring to the general statement in R v Fanjoy, [1985] 2 SCR 233: 31    In R v Trotchie, 2019 SKCA 43, [2019] 10 WWR. 187, Ottenbreit ......
  • R. v. CRAWFORD,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 20, 2022
    ...the recent decisions in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [35]               ......
  • R. v. FRIESEN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 8, 2021
    ...The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan in R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6 at para 59, 398 CCC (3d) 411 summed up the purpose of s. [59]     The object of this section is to prevent evidence of a complainant’s past sexual activity from being admitted for an improper reason.......
4 cases
  • R. v. F.I.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • October 8, 2021
    ...the recent decisions in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [12]               ......
  • R v Fast,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 31, 2022
    ...More relevant in the present situation is what was recently said by the Court in R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6, para 31, 398 CCC (3d) 411, after referring to the general statement in R v Fanjoy, [1985] 2 SCR 233: 31    In R v Trotchie, 2019 SKCA 43, [2019] 10 WWR. 187, Ottenbreit ......
  • R. v. CRAWFORD,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 20, 2022
    ...the recent decisions in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [35]               ......
  • R. v. FRIESEN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 8, 2021
    ...The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan in R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6 at para 59, 398 CCC (3d) 411 summed up the purpose of s. [59]     The object of this section is to prevent evidence of a complainant’s past sexual activity from being admitted for an improper reason.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT