R. v. Ellis (C.)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Doherty, Borins and Lang, JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2008 ONCA 77,[2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52 (CA),[2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52 |
| Date | 04 February 2008 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 practice notes
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 3 7, 2019)
...Mezzo v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802, R. v. Virgo, 2016 ONCA 792, R. v. Boast, 2019 ONCA 19, R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, R. v. MacIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), R. v. Richards (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.), R. v. Mey, 2011 ONCA 288, Rex. v. Goldhar; Rex......
-
R. v. Jack (C.)
...refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Francis (M.W.) (2002), 165 O.A.C. 131 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. F.A. (2004), 184 O.A.C. 324; 183 C.C.C.(3d) 518 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. Richards (L.) (2004), 186 O.A.C......
-
R. v. Araya (N.), (2013) 312 O.A.C. 284 (CA)
...R. v. James (R.) (2011), 287 O.A.C. 18; 283 C.C.C.(3d) 212; 2011 ONCA 839, refd to. [para. 164]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. R. v. Miaponoose (A.) (1996), 93 O.A.C. 115; 110 C.C.C.(3d) 445 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 172]. R. v. Tebo (K.) (2003), 172 ......
-
R. v. Benn
...and should be afforded little weight: R v Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426 at para 13; R v Foster, 2008 CanLII 8419 at para 40 (ONSC); R v Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77 at paras 5–8; R v Keddy, 2022 ONCJ 434 at para 45; R v FA, 2004 CanLII 10491 (ONCA) at para 64, 183 CCC (3d) 518; R v Gonsalves, 2008 CanLII 1......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
R. v. Jack (C.)
...refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Francis (M.W.) (2002), 165 O.A.C. 131 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. F.A. (2004), 184 O.A.C. 324; 183 C.C.C.(3d) 518 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. Richards (L.) (2004), 186 O.A.C......
-
R. v. Araya (N.), (2013) 312 O.A.C. 284 (CA)
...R. v. James (R.) (2011), 287 O.A.C. 18; 283 C.C.C.(3d) 212; 2011 ONCA 839, refd to. [para. 164]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. R. v. Miaponoose (A.) (1996), 93 O.A.C. 115; 110 C.C.C.(3d) 445 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 172]. R. v. Tebo (K.) (2003), 172 ......
-
R. v. Benn
...and should be afforded little weight: R v Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426 at para 13; R v Foster, 2008 CanLII 8419 at para 40 (ONSC); R v Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77 at paras 5–8; R v Keddy, 2022 ONCJ 434 at para 45; R v FA, 2004 CanLII 10491 (ONCA) at para 64, 183 CCC (3d) 518; R v Gonsalves, 2008 CanLII 1......
-
R. v. Keddy
...includes reference to any “distinctive features” and instead rely upon “generic and vague” descriptors: Jack at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5-8. The descriptors themselves may be of limited value where the witness’ vantage point, personal circumstances, or other factors r......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 3 7, 2019)
...Mezzo v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802, R. v. Virgo, 2016 ONCA 792, R. v. Boast, 2019 ONCA 19, R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, R. v. MacIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), R. v. Richards (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.), R. v. Mey, 2011 ONCA 288, Rex. v. Goldhar; Rex......
