R. v. Ellis (C.), 2008 ONCA 77
| Judge | Doherty, Borins and Lang, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Case Date | Monday February 04, 2008 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | 2008 ONCA 77;[2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52 (CA);[2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 practice notes
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 3 7, 2019)
...Mezzo v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802, R. v. Virgo, 2016 ONCA 792, R. v. Boast, 2019 ONCA 19, R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, R. v. MacIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), R. v. Richards (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.), R. v. Mey, 2011 ONCA 288, Rex. v. Goldhar; Rex......
-
R. v. Jack (C.), 2013 ONCA 80
...refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Francis (M.W.) (2002), 165 O.A.C. 131 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. F.A. (2004), 184 O.A.C. 324; 183 C.C.C.(3d) 518 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. Richards (L.) (2004), 186 O.A.C......
-
R. v. Keddy, 2022 ONCJ 434
...“distinctive features” and instead rely upon “generic and vague” descriptors: Jack at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5-8. The descriptors themselves may be of limited value where the witness’ vantage point, personal circumstances, or other ......
-
R. v. Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426
...are of little assistance: see also R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, 294 C.C.C. (3d) 163, at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5, P.C. Storozuk was also unable to identify any clothing that might have been visible from his vantage point, not even the colou......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
R. v. Jack (C.), 2013 ONCA 80
...refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Francis (M.W.) (2002), 165 O.A.C. 131 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. F.A. (2004), 184 O.A.C. 324; 183 C.C.C.(3d) 518 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. Richards (L.) (2004), 186 O.A.C......
-
R. v. Keddy, 2022 ONCJ 434
...“distinctive features” and instead rely upon “generic and vague” descriptors: Jack at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5-8. The descriptors themselves may be of limited value where the witness’ vantage point, personal circumstances, or other ......
-
R. v. Araya (N.), (2013) 312 O.A.C. 284 (CA)
...R. v. James (R.) (2011), 287 O.A.C. 18; 283 C.C.C.(3d) 212; 2011 ONCA 839, refd to. [para. 164]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. R. v. Miaponoose (A.) (1996), 93 O.A.C. 115; 110 C.C.C.(3d) 445 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 172]. R. v. Tebo (K.) (2003), 172 ......
-
R. v. Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426
...are of little assistance: see also R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, 294 C.C.C. (3d) 163, at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5, P.C. Storozuk was also unable to identify any clothing that might have been visible from his vantage point, not even the colou......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 3 7, 2019)
...Mezzo v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802, R. v. Virgo, 2016 ONCA 792, R. v. Boast, 2019 ONCA 19, R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, R. v. MacIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), R. v. Richards (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.), R. v. Mey, 2011 ONCA 288, Rex. v. Goldhar; Rex......