R. v. Ellis (C.), 2008 ONCA 77

JudgeDoherty, Borins and Lang, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Case DateFebruary 04, 2008
JurisdictionOntario
Citations2008 ONCA 77;[2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52 (CA);[2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 practice notes
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 3 – 7, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 26, 2019
    ...Mezzo v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802, R. v. Virgo, 2016 ONCA 792, R. v. Boast, 2019 ONCA 19, R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, R. v. MacIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), R. v. Richards (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.), R. v. Mey, 2011 ONCA 288, Rex. v. Goldhar; Rex......
  • R. v. Jack (C.), 2013 ONCA 80
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 22, 2012
    ...refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Francis (M.W.) (2002), 165 O.A.C. 131 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. F.A. (2004), 184 O.A.C. 324; 183 C.C.C.(3d) 518 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. Richards (L.) (2004), 186 O.A.C......
  • R. v. Keddy, 2022 ONCJ 434
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • July 21, 2022
    ...“distinctive features” and instead rely upon “generic and vague” descriptors: Jack at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5-8. The descriptors themselves may be of limited value where the witness’ vantage point, personal circumstances, or other ......
  • R. v. Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 21, 2021
    ...are of little assistance: see also R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, 294 C.C.C. (3d) 163, at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5, P.C. Storozuk was also unable to identify any clothing that might have been visible from his vantage point, not even the colou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • R. v. Jack (C.), 2013 ONCA 80
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 22, 2012
    ...refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Francis (M.W.) (2002), 165 O.A.C. 131 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. F.A. (2004), 184 O.A.C. 324; 183 C.C.C.(3d) 518 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16]. R. v. Richards (L.) (2004), 186 O.A.C......
  • R. v. Keddy, 2022 ONCJ 434
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • July 21, 2022
    ...“distinctive features” and instead rely upon “generic and vague” descriptors: Jack at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5-8. The descriptors themselves may be of limited value where the witness’ vantage point, personal circumstances, or other ......
  • R. v. Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 21, 2021
    ...are of little assistance: see also R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, 294 C.C.C. (3d) 163, at para. 16; R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, at paras. 5, P.C. Storozuk was also unable to identify any clothing that might have been visible from his vantage point, not even the colou......
  • R. v. Araya (N.), (2013) 312 O.A.C. 284 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 19, 2013
    ...R. v. James (R.) (2011), 287 O.A.C. 18; 283 C.C.C.(3d) 212; 2011 ONCA 839, refd to. [para. 164]. R. v. Ellis (C.), [2008] O.A.C. Uned. 52; 2008 ONCA 77, refd to. [para. R. v. Miaponoose (A.) (1996), 93 O.A.C. 115; 110 C.C.C.(3d) 445 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 172]. R. v. Tebo (K.) (2003), 172 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 3 – 7, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 26, 2019
    ...Mezzo v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802, R. v. Virgo, 2016 ONCA 792, R. v. Boast, 2019 ONCA 19, R. v. Jack, 2013 ONCA 80, R. v. Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77, R. v. MacIntosh (1997), 35 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.), R. v. Richards (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.), R. v. Mey, 2011 ONCA 288, Rex. v. Goldhar; Rex......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT