R. v. F.H., (2016) 376 N.S.R.(2d) 349 (CA)

JudgeFichaud, J.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 27, 2016
JurisdictionNova Scotia
Citations(2016), 376 N.S.R.(2d) 349 (CA);2016 NSCA 70

R. v. F.H. (2016), 376 N.S.R.(2d) 349 (CA);

    1185 A.P.R. 349

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2016] N.S.R.(2d) TBEd. SE.033

F.H. (applicant) v. Her Majesty the Queen (respondent)

(CAC 450452; 2016 NSCA 70)

Indexed As: R. v. F.H.

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

Fichaud, J.A.

September 27, 2016.

Summary:

A jury convicted the 67 year old accused of buggery, incest, sexual assault, indecent assault, gross indecency and sexual intercourse with a female under age 14. The offences related to the sexual abuse of his daughter in the mid 1970's until the early or mid 1980's starting when she was about four years of age. The abuse progressed from fondling to oral sex and digital penetration of her vagina and then to forced vaginal and anal intercourse.

The Nova Scotia Supreme Court, in a judgment reported (2015), 356 N.S.R.(2d) 60; 1126 A.P.R. 60, sentenced the accused to a global sentence of nine years' imprisonment. Under s. 678(1) of the Criminal Code, the accused had 25 days to file and deliver a notice of appeal from his convictions and sentence (i.e., by March 12, 2015). Thirteen months later, the accused moved to extend the time to file and deliver his notice of appeal.

The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, per Fichaud, J.A., dismissed the motion. There was no reasonable explanation for the 13 month delay.

Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Criminal Law - Topic 4909

Appeals - Indictable offences - Procedure - Notice of appeal or application for leave to appeal - Time for filing or serving (incl. extension of) - The 67 year old accused was convicted of a number of sexual offences respecting the sexual abuse of his daughter in the 1970's and 1980's - He was sentenced to a total of nine years' imprisonment - Under s. 678(1) of the Criminal Code, the accused had 25 days to file and deliver a notice of appeal from his convictions and sentence (i.e., by March 12, 2015) - Thirteen months later, the accused moved to extend the time to file and deliver his notice of appeal - The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, per Fichaud, J.A., dismissed the motion - At the commencement of his imprisonment, the accused was told how to start a prisoner appeal, how to obtain free legal advice, and was given the opportunity to do so - The accused had a university degree in theology, was fully literate, and had an acute intellect - The court disbelieved that the accused did not understand anything respecting his right to appeal until shortly before he filed the present motion - The lack of any reasonable explanation for the 13 month delay was fatal.

Counsel:

F.H., on his own behalf;

Marian Fortune-Stone, Q.C., for the respondent.

This motion was heard on September 22, 2016, at Halifax, N.S., in Chambers before Fichaud, J.A., of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal.

On September 27, 2016, Fichaud, J.A., delivered the following judgment for the Court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • MacNutt v. Acadia University et al., 2016 NSCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 17 October 2016
    ...factors. Ultimately, the question is - what is in the interests of justice? R. v. Roberge , [2005] 2 S.C.R. 469, para. 6; R. v. F.H. , 2016 NSCA 70, paras. 11-12; Allen v. Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal) , 2011 NSCA 72, para. 17. [18] Ms. MacNutt's affidavit explains he......
  • Mohammed v. Hanson, 2018 NSCA 38
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 3 May 2018
    ...but ultimately the issue is whether the extension is in the interests of justice: R. v. Roberge, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 469, para. 6; R. v. F.H., 2016 NSCA 70, paras. 11-12; Allen v. Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal), 2011 NSCA 72, para. 17; MacNutt v. Acadia University, 2016 NS......
  • Ezurike v. Gbeve,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 30 March 2023
    ...the proposed appeal. See: Nelson v. Dorey,  2020 NSCA 34, at ¶18-19; Farrell v. Casavant, 2010 NSCA 71, at ¶17; R. v. F.H., 2016 NSCA 70, at ¶11-12; Bellefontaine v. Schneiderman, 2006 NSCA 96, at [10]         The foregoing factors......
  • Nelson v. Dorey, 2020 NSCA 34
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 27 March 2020
    ...of the applicant to exercise his right of appeal within the prescribed time limit. (Farrell v. Casavant, 2010 NSCA 71 at ¶17; R. v. F.H., 2016 NSCA 70 at [20] The second and fifth factors can be conveniently considered together. [21] These factors are to guide the exercise of the Court’s di......
4 cases
  • MacNutt v. Acadia University et al., 2016 NSCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 17 October 2016
    ...factors. Ultimately, the question is - what is in the interests of justice? R. v. Roberge , [2005] 2 S.C.R. 469, para. 6; R. v. F.H. , 2016 NSCA 70, paras. 11-12; Allen v. Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal) , 2011 NSCA 72, para. 17. [18] Ms. MacNutt's affidavit explains he......
  • Mohammed v. Hanson, 2018 NSCA 38
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 3 May 2018
    ...but ultimately the issue is whether the extension is in the interests of justice: R. v. Roberge, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 469, para. 6; R. v. F.H., 2016 NSCA 70, paras. 11-12; Allen v. Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal), 2011 NSCA 72, para. 17; MacNutt v. Acadia University, 2016 NS......
  • Ezurike v. Gbeve,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 30 March 2023
    ...the proposed appeal. See: Nelson v. Dorey,  2020 NSCA 34, at ¶18-19; Farrell v. Casavant, 2010 NSCA 71, at ¶17; R. v. F.H., 2016 NSCA 70, at ¶11-12; Bellefontaine v. Schneiderman, 2006 NSCA 96, at [10]         The foregoing factors......
  • Nelson v. Dorey, 2020 NSCA 34
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 27 March 2020
    ...of the applicant to exercise his right of appeal within the prescribed time limit. (Farrell v. Casavant, 2010 NSCA 71 at ¶17; R. v. F.H., 2016 NSCA 70 at [20] The second and fifth factors can be conveniently considered together. [21] These factors are to guide the exercise of the Court’s di......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT