R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109

CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Case DateSeptember 07, 2016
JurisdictionManitoba
Citations2016 MBCA 109
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • R v Letkeman,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • July 15, 2021
    ...where the offender has not previously been incarcerated (see R v Dunn, 2011 NBCA 19; R v Smickle, 2014 ONCA 49; Schertzer; R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109 at paras 63-72; and Sass/Zammit). [93]                 In the pre......
  • R v Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 21, 2017
    ...the risk it may pose to his [or her] rehabilitation and full reintegration into the community” (Smickle at para 18). See also R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109 at paras 67-72. [40] This Court has discussed the relevant principles to be considered on re-incarceration in several instances recently (see ......
  • R v GS,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • April 21, 2022
    ...When imposing the sentence, the trial judge relied on R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109, and concluded that the three-year starting point for sexual assault in R v Sandercock, 1985 ABCA 218 applied in this case.  However, he acknowledged the Supreme Court of Canada’s comments in R v Friese......
  • R v D&J Isley & Sons Contracting Ltd, 2020 ABQB 11
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 7, 2020
    ...on the standard of correctness: (i) whether the court could pierce the corporate veil and impose a sanction binding Mr. Isley: R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109 at para 15; and (ii) what the applicable legal test for invoking this power was: Delizia Limited v Nevsun Resources Ltd, 2017 FCA 187 at para......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R v Letkeman,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • July 15, 2021
    ...where the offender has not previously been incarcerated (see R v Dunn, 2011 NBCA 19; R v Smickle, 2014 ONCA 49; Schertzer; R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109 at paras 63-72; and Sass/Zammit). [93]                 In the pre......
  • R v Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 21, 2017
    ...the risk it may pose to his [or her] rehabilitation and full reintegration into the community” (Smickle at para 18). See also R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109 at paras 67-72. [40] This Court has discussed the relevant principles to be considered on re-incarceration in several instances recently (see ......
  • R v GS,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • April 21, 2022
    ...When imposing the sentence, the trial judge relied on R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109, and concluded that the three-year starting point for sexual assault in R v Sandercock, 1985 ABCA 218 applied in this case.  However, he acknowledged the Supreme Court of Canada’s comments in R v Friese......
  • R v D&J Isley & Sons Contracting Ltd, 2020 ABQB 11
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 7, 2020
    ...on the standard of correctness: (i) whether the court could pierce the corporate veil and impose a sanction binding Mr. Isley: R v GGS, 2016 MBCA 109 at para 15; and (ii) what the applicable legal test for invoking this power was: Delizia Limited v Nevsun Resources Ltd, 2017 FCA 187 at para......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT