R. v. Gough (E.), [2013] O.A.C. Uned. 109
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Epstein, Hoy and Lauwers, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | [2013] O.A.C. Uned. 109,[2013] O.A.C. Uned. 109 (CA),2013 ONCA 137 |
| Date | 06 March 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 practice notes
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 3 7, 2019)
...(3d) 419 (C.A.), R. v. Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39, R. v. Lewis, 2018 ONCA 351, R. v. Baltovich (2004), 73 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), R. v. Gough, 2013 ONCA 137, R. v. Pimentel (1995), 85 O.A.C. 395 (C.A.), R. v. Tat (1997), 117 C.C.C. (3d) 481 (C.A.), R. v. Goran, 2008 ONA 195, 234 O.A.C. 283, Mezzo v......
-
R v Lachance,
...SCC 39 at paras 50–52, [2002] 2 SCR 445 [Hibbert]. As the Ontario Court of Appeal noted in its per curiam decision in R v Gough, 2013 ONCA 137, it is not only acceptable, but essential that trial judges be aware of the risks associated with eyewitness identification evidence, and att......
-
R v Clark,
...The shortcomings of eyewitness identification evidence are well known: Hibbert, Bigsky, and R v Gough, 2013 ONCA 137 at paras 35–37. Such evidence is notoriously unreliable, even when it is delivered by a confident and trustworthy witness. When a case being tried before a judge ......
-
Brazeau v. Canada (Attorney General),
...Ontario (Special Investigations Unit), 2012 ONCA 536 at paras. 26, 60; R. v. Morgentaler, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 616 at p. 676. [38] R. Summers, 2013 ONCA 137 at para. 84; R. v. Lebar, 2010 ONCA 220 at para. 40; Németh v. Canada (Justice), 2010 SCC 56, at para. 4; Reference re Firearms Act (C......
Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
-
R v Lachance,
...SCC 39 at paras 50–52, [2002] 2 SCR 445 [Hibbert]. As the Ontario Court of Appeal noted in its per curiam decision in R v Gough, 2013 ONCA 137, it is not only acceptable, but essential that trial judges be aware of the risks associated with eyewitness identification evidence, and att......
-
R v Clark,
...The shortcomings of eyewitness identification evidence are well known: Hibbert, Bigsky, and R v Gough, 2013 ONCA 137 at paras 35–37. Such evidence is notoriously unreliable, even when it is delivered by a confident and trustworthy witness. When a case being tried before a judge ......
-
Brazeau v. Canada (Attorney General),
...Ontario (Special Investigations Unit), 2012 ONCA 536 at paras. 26, 60; R. v. Morgentaler, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 616 at p. 676. [38] R. Summers, 2013 ONCA 137 at para. 84; R. v. Lebar, 2010 ONCA 220 at para. 40; Németh v. Canada (Justice), 2010 SCC 56, at para. 4; Reference re Firearms Act (C......
-
R. v. Webbe-Wong,
...7; R. v. Richards (2004), 70 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.), at para. 32) and expect trial judges to self-instruct on this issue: R. v. Gough, 2013 ONCA 137, at para. 38. We do so without expert evidence because judicial notice can be taken of this phenomenon: McIntosh, at pp. 394-5; R. v. B.M. (1998......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 3 7, 2019)
...(3d) 419 (C.A.), R. v. Hibbert, 2002 SCC 39, R. v. Lewis, 2018 ONCA 351, R. v. Baltovich (2004), 73 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), R. v. Gough, 2013 ONCA 137, R. v. Pimentel (1995), 85 O.A.C. 395 (C.A.), R. v. Tat (1997), 117 C.C.C. (3d) 481 (C.A.), R. v. Goran, 2008 ONA 195, 234 O.A.C. 283, Mezzo v......