R.A. v. Her Majesty The Queen, 2018 SCC 13
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm |
| Date | 26 March 2018 |
| Docket Number | 37757 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 SCC 13 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 practice notes
-
R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
...accepting the evidence of a complainant and basing a conviction upon it: R v R.A., 2017 ONCA 714 at paras 44–46, 421 DLR (4th) 100 (aff’d 2018 SCC 13, [2018] 1 SCR 307). Where there are inconsistencies in a witness’ evidence, it is for the trier of fact to assess their significance and dete......
-
R v D.B.,
...resolve every inconsistency in the evidence raised by the defence (Arno at para 30; see also: R.E.M. at paras 18–20; and R v R.A., 2018 SCC 13, affirming 2017 ONCA 714 at para 45, [2018] 1 SCR 307). When a case turns largely on determinations of credibility, the sufficiency of a tria......
-
R v Bear,
...in the evidence” (Dirksen at para 80; see also R v R.A., 2017 ONCA 714 at paras 44-46, 421 DLR (4th) 100 (aff’d 2018 SCC 13, [2018] 1 SCR 307); and R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para 33 (rev’d 2020 SCC 40, without disturbing the general principles set out by the [28] ......
-
R. v. Taylor, 2021 NSSC 120
...evidence [37] The governing principles are set out in R v RA, 2017 ONCA 714 (affirmed 2018 SCC 13). Per the (1) The first ground of appeal Did the trial judge fail to resolve a critical inconsistency and fail to explain why he accepted......
Request a trial to view additional results
32 cases
-
R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
...accepting the evidence of a complainant and basing a conviction upon it: R v R.A., 2017 ONCA 714 at paras 44–46, 421 DLR (4th) 100 (aff’d 2018 SCC 13, [2018] 1 SCR 307). Where there are inconsistencies in a witness’ evidence, it is for the trier of fact to assess their significance and dete......
-
R v Bear,
...in the evidence” (Dirksen at para 80; see also R v R.A., 2017 ONCA 714 at paras 44-46, 421 DLR (4th) 100 (aff’d 2018 SCC 13, [2018] 1 SCR 307); and R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para 33 (rev’d 2020 SCC 40, without disturbing the general principles set out by the [28] ......
-
R v D.B.,
...resolve every inconsistency in the evidence raised by the defence (Arno at para 30; see also: R.E.M. at paras 18–20; and R v R.A., 2018 SCC 13, affirming 2017 ONCA 714 at para 45, [2018] 1 SCR 307). When a case turns largely on determinations of credibility, the sufficiency of a tria......
-
R. v. Taylor, 2021 NSSC 120
...evidence [37] The governing principles are set out in R v RA, 2017 ONCA 714 (affirmed 2018 SCC 13). Per the (1) The first ground of appeal Did the trial judge fail to resolve a critical inconsistency and fail to explain why he accepted......
Request a trial to view additional results