R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Whitmore, Leurer and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 37 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 31 March 2020 |
| Docket Number | CACR3257 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 practice notes
-
Figg v. R,
...more rigorous scrutiny than the evidence of the Crown. See, for example: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61 at paras. 31-33; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para. 29; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42 at para. 82; R. v. E.H., 2020 ONCA 405 at paras. 40-41; R. v. Willis, 2019 NSCA 64 at paras. 40-45; R......
-
R v Profeit,
...any ringing endorsement by the Supreme Court as an independent ground of review: R v Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, 399 CCC (3d) 1, reversing 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147; F(G) at paras 99-100. There is no W(D) error by the trial judge here nor is one alleged. The trial judge gave quite sufficient ......
-
R v Bear,
...para 80; see also R v R.A., 2017 ONCA 714 at paras 44-46, 421 DLR (4th) 100 (aff’d 2018 SCC 13, [2018] 1 SCR 307); and R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para 33 (rev’d 2020 SCC 40, without disturbing the general principles set out by the [28] ......
-
R v Mela,
...of proof: R v Strathdee, 2020 ABCA 306 at paras 7-12, [2020] AJ No 913 (QL); R v Mehari, 2020 SCC 40 at para 1, [2020] SCJ No 40 (QL) from 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147. [26] Character evidence is also raised by the appellant. Misuse of character evidence for propensity reasoning also rais......
Request a trial to view additional results
32 cases
-
Figg v. R,
...more rigorous scrutiny than the evidence of the Crown. See, for example: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61 at paras. 31-33; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para. 29; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42 at para. 82; R. v. E.H., 2020 ONCA 405 at paras. 40-41; R. v. Willis, 2019 NSCA 64 at paras. 40-45; R......
-
R v Profeit,
...any ringing endorsement by the Supreme Court as an independent ground of review: R v Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, 399 CCC (3d) 1, reversing 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147; F(G) at paras 99-100. There is no W(D) error by the trial judge here nor is one alleged. The trial judge gave quite sufficient ......
-
R v Mela,
...of proof: R v Strathdee, 2020 ABCA 306 at paras 7-12, [2020] AJ No 913 (QL); R v Mehari, 2020 SCC 40 at para 1, [2020] SCJ No 40 (QL) from 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147. [26] Character evidence is also raised by the appellant. Misuse of character evidence for propensity reasoning also rais......
-
R v Bear,
...para 80; see also R v R.A., 2017 ONCA 714 at paras 44-46, 421 DLR (4th) 100 (aff’d 2018 SCC 13, [2018] 1 SCR 307); and R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para 33 (rev’d 2020 SCC 40, without disturbing the general principles set out by the [28] ......
Request a trial to view additional results