R. v. Hodgson,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Lamer, Antonio; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil |
| Date | 24 September 1998 |
| Citation | [1998] 2 SCR 449,127 CCC (3d) 449,JE 98-1956,1998 CanLII 798 (SCC),39 WCB (2d) 391,18 CR (5th) 135,[1998] SCJ No 66 (QL),230 NR 1,163 DLR (4th) 577,113 OAC 97,[1998] CarswellOnt 3417 |
| Docket Number | 25561 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
302 practice notes
-
R. v. D.J.M., (2003) 343 A.R. 11 (QB)
...C.C.C.(3d) 449; 190 D.L.R.(4th) 591; 2000 SCC 40; 36 C.R.(5th) 1; [2000] 11 W.W.R. 1, refd to. [para. 37, footnote 60]. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; 230 N.R. 1; 113 O.A.C. 97; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 449; 18 C.R.(5th) 135; 163 D.L.R.(4th) 577, refd to. [para. 37, footnote 61]. R. v. Buric (G.J......
-
R. v. McKay (S.A.), 2003 MBQB 141
..."¶64 I agree that there is no absolute rule requiring the recording of statements. It is clear from the analysis in both Hodgson [(1998), 127 C.C.C.(3d) 449] and Oickle [(2000), 147 C.C.C.(3d) 321] that the inquiry into voluntariness is contextual in nature and that all relevant circumstanc......
-
R. v. T.W.W., 2024 SCC 19
...2019 SCC 33, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 579; R. v. L.S., 2017 ONCA 685, 354 C.C.C. (3d) 71; R. v. Osolin, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 595; R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; R. v. Sweezey (1974), 20 C.C.C. (2d) 400; R. v. Kahsai, 2023 SCC 20; Amell v. The Queen, 2013 SKCA 48, 2013 D.T.C. 5102; R. v. Harris (1997......
-
R. v. Budai (M.K.) et al., (2001) 153 B.C.A.C. 98 (CA)
...2 Cr. App. Rep. 625 (C.A.), consd. [para. 40]. R. v. Hertrich (1982), 67 C.C.C.(2d) 510 (Ont. C.A.), consd. [para. 40]. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; 230 N.R. 1; 113 O.A.C. 1; 18 C.R.(5th) 135; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 479, refd to. [para. Auckland Casino Ltd. v. Casino Control Authority, [1995]......
Get Started for Free
255 cases
-
R. v. D.J.M., (2003) 343 A.R. 11 (QB)
...C.C.C.(3d) 449; 190 D.L.R.(4th) 591; 2000 SCC 40; 36 C.R.(5th) 1; [2000] 11 W.W.R. 1, refd to. [para. 37, footnote 60]. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; 230 N.R. 1; 113 O.A.C. 97; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 449; 18 C.R.(5th) 135; 163 D.L.R.(4th) 577, refd to. [para. 37, footnote 61]. R. v. Buric (G.J......
-
R. v. Budai (M.K.) et al., (2001) 153 B.C.A.C. 98 (CA)
...2 Cr. App. Rep. 625 (C.A.), consd. [para. 40]. R. v. Hertrich (1982), 67 C.C.C.(2d) 510 (Ont. C.A.), consd. [para. 40]. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; 230 N.R. 1; 113 O.A.C. 1; 18 C.R.(5th) 135; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 479, refd to. [para. Auckland Casino Ltd. v. Casino Control Authority, [1995]......
-
R. v. Tessier,
...23, 374 C.C.C. (3d) 360; R. v. Spencer, 2007 SCC 11, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 500; Rothman v. The Queen, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 640; R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; Gach v. The King, [1943] S.C.R. 250; R. v. Lapointe and Sicotte (1983), 9 C.C.C. (3d) 366, aff’d [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1253; R. v. Crawfo......
-
R. v. Sanche (W.), (2003) 347 A.R. 133 (PC)
...refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. Erven, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 926; 25 N.R. 49; 30 N.S.R.(2d) 89; 49 A.P.R. 89, refd to. [para. 57]. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; 230 N.R. 1; 113 O.A.C. 97; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 449, refd to. [para. R. v. Park, [1981] 2 S.C.R. 64; 37 N.R. 501; 59 C.C.C.(2d) 385, refd to. ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 12 16, 2018)
...R v Tran (2001), 55 OR (3d) 161, R v Dimmock (1996), 47 CR (4th) 120, R v Breton, 2018 ONCA 753, R v Park, [1981] 1 SCR 64, R v Hodgson, [1998] 2 SCR 449, R v Sweezey (1974), 20 CCC (2d) 400 (Ont CA), Erven v The Queen, [1979] 1 SCR 926, R v Richards, 2017 ONCA 424, R v Roberts, 2018 ONCA 4......
49 books & journal articles
-
The Trial Process
...procedures in ss 540(7), (8), & (9) do not carry over to trials. 132 Section 655. 133 R v Park , [1981] 2 SCR 64. 134 R v Hodgson , [1998] 2 SCR 449. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 398 The Crown has considerable discretion in deciding how to present its case, consistent with the adversarial nature of t......
-
Threshold Matters
...94 The Crown always bears the onus of proving that an accused’s statement to a person in authority was made voluntarily: R v Hodgson , [1998] 2 SCR 449 at para 37, 1998 CanLII 798. In accordance with the normal allocation of the burden of proof on a Charter application, however, the accused......
-
The Trial Process
...Provisions in the Code create special rules around proof of 122 Section 655. 123 R. v. Park , [1981] 2 S.C.R. 64. 124 R. v. Hodgson , [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449. 125 See Lemay v. The King , [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232; R. v. Yebes , [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; Cook , above note 118; Jolivet , above note 118. 126......
-
Table of Cases
...580 R. v. Hicks, [2009] O.J. No. 743 (S.C.J.) .............................................................. 444 R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449, 18 C.R. (5th) 135, 127 C.C.C. (3d) 449 ............................................................................. 324, 326 R. v. Hoffman (1......
Get Started for Free