Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 SCR 449

Judgment Cited authorities 37 Cited in 314 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeLamer, Antonio; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil
Date24 September 1998
Citation[1998] 2 SCR 449,127 CCC (3d) 449,JE 98-1956,1998 CanLII 798 (SCC),39 WCB (2d) 391,18 CR (5th) 135,[1998] SCJ No 66 (QL),230 NR 1,163 DLR (4th) 577,113 OAC 97,[1998] CarswellOnt 3417
Docket Number25561
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
300 practice notes
  • R. v. D.J.M., (2003) 343 A.R. 11 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 10, 2003
    ...C.C.C.(3d) 449; 190 D.L.R.(4th) 591; 2000 SCC 40; 36 C.R.(5th) 1; [2000] 11 W.W.R. 1, refd to. [para. 37, footnote 60]. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; 230 N.R. 1; 113 O.A.C. 97; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 449; 18 C.R.(5th) 135; 163 D.L.R.(4th) 577, refd to. [para. 37, footnote 61]. R. v. Buric (G.J......
  • R. v. McKay (S.A.), 2003 MBQB 141
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • June 10, 2003
    ..."¶64 I agree that there is no absolute rule requiring the recording of statements. It is clear from the analysis in both Hodgson [(1998), 127 C.C.C.(3d) 449] and Oickle [(2000), 147 C.C.C.(3d) 321] that the inquiry into voluntariness is contextual in nature and that all relevant circumstanc......
  • R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2022
    ...R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; Chromiak v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 471; R. v. Hawkins, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; Friedmann Equity Developments Inc. v. Final Note Ltd., 2000 SCC 34, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 842; R. v. Prokofiew, 2012 SCC 49, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 639......
  • R. v. T.W.W., 2024 SCC 19
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 24, 2024
    ...2019 SCC 33, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 579; R. v. L.S., 2017 ONCA 685, 354 C.C.C. (3d) 71; R. v. Osolin, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 595; R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; R. v. Sweezey (1974), 20 C.C.C. (2d) 400; R. v. Kahsai, 2023 SCC 20; Amell v. The Queen, 2013 SKCA 48, 2013 D.T.C. 5102; R. v. Harris (1997......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
250 cases
  • R. v. D.J.M., (2003) 343 A.R. 11 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 10, 2003
    ...C.C.C.(3d) 449; 190 D.L.R.(4th) 591; 2000 SCC 40; 36 C.R.(5th) 1; [2000] 11 W.W.R. 1, refd to. [para. 37, footnote 60]. R. v. M.C.H., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; 230 N.R. 1; 113 O.A.C. 97; 127 C.C.C.(3d) 449; 18 C.R.(5th) 135; 163 D.L.R.(4th) 577, refd to. [para. 37, footnote 61]. R. v. Buric (G.J......
  • R. v. McKay (S.A.), 2003 MBQB 141
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • June 10, 2003
    ..."¶64 I agree that there is no absolute rule requiring the recording of statements. It is clear from the analysis in both Hodgson [(1998), 127 C.C.C.(3d) 449] and Oickle [(2000), 147 C.C.C.(3d) 321] that the inquiry into voluntariness is contextual in nature and that all relevant circumstanc......
  • R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2022
    ...R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; Chromiak v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 471; R. v. Hawkins, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; Friedmann Equity Developments Inc. v. Final Note Ltd., 2000 SCC 34, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 842; R. v. Prokofiew, 2012 SCC 49, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 639......
  • R. v. T.W.W., 2024 SCC 19
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 24, 2024
    ...2019 SCC 33, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 579; R. v. L.S., 2017 ONCA 685, 354 C.C.C. (3d) 71; R. v. Osolin, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 595; R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; R. v. Sweezey (1974), 20 C.C.C. (2d) 400; R. v. Kahsai, 2023 SCC 20; Amell v. The Queen, 2013 SKCA 48, 2013 D.T.C. 5102; R. v. Harris (1997......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 12 – 16, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 22, 2018
    ...R v Tran (2001), 55 OR (3d) 161, R v Dimmock (1996), 47 CR (4th) 120, R v Breton, 2018 ONCA 753, R v Park, [1981] 1 SCR 64, R v Hodgson, [1998] 2 SCR 449, R v Sweezey (1974), 20 CCC (2d) 400 (Ont CA), Erven v The Queen, [1979] 1 SCR 926, R v Richards, 2017 ONCA 424, R v Roberts, 2018 ONCA 4......
54 books & journal articles
  • The Trial Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...procedures in ss 540(7), (8), & (9) do not carry over to trials. 163 Section 655. 164 R v Park , [1981] 2 SCR 64. 165 R v Hodgson , [1998] 2 SCR 449. The Trial Process 515 a view to creating efficiencies to protect the right to a trial within a reasonable time, 166 this general proposition ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...575 R v Hirsch, 2017 SKCA 14, 353 CCC (3d) 230 ................................................... 495 R v Hodgson, [1998] 2 SCR 449, 127 CCC (3d) 449, [1998] SCJ No 66 ........... 514 R v Hoelscher, 2016 ABQB 44 ............................................................................ 1......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Evidence. Revised Fifth Edition
    • September 2, 2008
    ...(3d) 129 ....................................................................................................... 527 R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449, 18 C.R. (5th) 135, 127 C.C.C. (3d) 449, 163 D.L.R. (4th) 577 ............................................................ 322, 324 R. v. H......
  • The Trial Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Criminal Procedure. Second Edition
    • September 2, 2012
    ...trial in some circumstances. 141 Videotaped testimony by a person under eighteen or with a physical or mental dis- 132 R. v. Hodgson , [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449. 133 See Lemay v. The King , [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232; R. v. Yebes , [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; Cook , above note 126; Jolivet , above note 126. 13......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT