R. v. Hynes (D.W.), (2001) 278 N.R. 299 (SCC)

Document

Cited authorities 54

Cited in 123

Precedent Map

Judge	McLachlin, C.J.C., L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel, JJ.
Court	Supreme Court of Canada
Case Date	December 06, 2001
Jurisdiction	Canada (Federal)
Citations	(2001), 278 N.R. 299 (SCC);2001 SCC 82

R. v. Hynes (D.W.) (2001), 278 N.R. 299 (SCC)

MLB headnote and full text

[French language version follows English language version]

[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]

....................

Temp. Cite: [2001] N.R. TBEd. DE.003

Dwayne W. Hynes (appellant) v. Her Majesty the Queen (respondent) and The Attorney General of Canada, The Attorney General for Ontario, The Attorney General of Manitoba, The Attorney General of British Columbia and The Attorney General for Alberta (interveners)

(27443; 2001 SCC 82)

Indexed As: R. v. Hynes (D.W.)

Supreme Court of Canada

McLachlin, C.J.C., L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel, JJ.

December 6, 2001.

Summary:

The accused was charged with causing death by criminal negligence (s. 220 of the Criminal Code), failure to stop at an accident scene (s. 252(1)(b)), and impaired driving (s. 255(3)). The accused applied for a declaration that a preliminary inquiry judge or justice was a "court of competent jurisdiction" under s. 24(1) of the Charter for the purpose of excluding Charter-offending evidence under s. 24(2).

The Newfoundland Provincial Court, in an unreported oral decision, dismissed the application. The accused applied for an order in the nature of certiorari and mandamus to direct the preliminary inquiry judge to conduct the inquiry under s. 24.

The Newfoundland Supreme Court, Trial Division, in an unreported oral decision, dismissed the application. The accused appealed.

The Newfoundland Court of Appeal, Green, J.A., dissenting, dismissed the appeal. See 177 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 232; 543 A.P.R. 232. The accused appealed.

The Supreme Court of Canada, Major, Iacobucci, Binnie and Arbour, JJ., dissenting, dismissed the appeal.

Civil Rights - Topic 8363

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Denial of rights - Jurisdiction (incl. court of competent jurisdiction) - Preliminary inquiry judge - The Supreme Court of Canada held that a justice presiding at a preliminary inquiry was not a court of competent jurisdiction for the purposes of an application under s. 24(1) of the Charter to exclude evidence under s. 24(2) - In particular, the power of a preliminary inquiry justice to exclude confessions under s. 542(1) of the Criminal Code did not extend to exclusion on Charter grounds - See paragraphs 1 to 50.

Civil Rights - Topic 8504

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Enforcement - Jurisdiction - [See Civil Rights - Topic 8363 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 3527

Preliminary inquiry - Jurisdiction - Charter issues - [See Civil Rights - Topic 8363 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 3528

Preliminary inquiry - Jurisdiction - Whether court of competent jurisdiction under Charter - [See Civil Rights - Topic 8363 ].

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Mills, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 863; 67 N.R. 241; 16 O.A.C. 81; 52 C.R.(3d) 1; 26 C.C.C.(3d) 481, folld. [paras. 6, 58].

R. v. Smith (M.H.), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1120; 102 N.R. 205; 63 Man.R.(2d) 81, refd to. [para. 6].

R. v. Seaboyer and Gayme, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; 128 N.R. 81; 48 O.A.C. 81; 66 C.C.C.(3d) 321; 7 C.R.(4th) 117; 83 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to. [paras. 6, 101].

R. v. Bernard, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833; 90 N.R. 321; 32 O.A.C. 161; 45 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 67 C.R.(3d) 113; 38 C.R.R. 82, refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. Robinson (D.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 683; 194 N.R. 1; 72 B.C.A.C. 161; 119 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. Chaulk and Morrissette, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; 119 N.R. 161; 69 Man.R.(2d) 161; [1991] 2 W.W.R. 385; 62 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 1 C.R.R.(2d) 1; 2 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [paras. 22, 112].

R. v. K.G.B., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740; 148 N.R. 241; 61 O.A.C. 1; 79 C.C.C.(3d) 257, refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc. et al. (2001) 279 N.R. 345 (S.C.C.), appld. [paras. 23, 61].

R. v. Caccamo, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 786; 4 N.R. 133; 21 C.C.C.(2d) 257, refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Skogman, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 93; 54 N.R. 34; 13 C.C.C.(3d) 161, refd to. [paras. 30, 78].

R. v. O'Connor (H.P.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411; 191 N.R. 1; 68 B.C.A.C. 1; 112 W.A.C. 1; 103 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Chew, [1968] 2 C.C.C. 127 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Girimonte (F.) (1997), 105 O.A.C. 337; 121 C.C.C.(3d) 33 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Richards (M.) (1997), 100 O.A.C. 215; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 377 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

United States of America v. Shephard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 9 N.R. 215; 30 C.C.C.(2d) 424; 70 D.L.R.(3d) 136; 34 C.R.N.S. 207, refd to. [paras. 34, 63].

R. v. Patterson, [1970] S.C.R. 409; 10 C.R.N.S. 55; 72 W.W.R.(N.S.) 35; 2 C.C.C.(2d) 229; 9 D.L.R.(3d) 398, refd to. [para. 38].

R. v. Rahey, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 588; 75 N.R. 81; 78 N.S.R.(2d) 183; 193 A.P.R. 183; 57 C.R.(3d) 289; 33 C.C.C.(3d) 289; 39 D.L.R.(4th) 481; 33 C.R.R. 275, refd to. [para. 40].

R. v. Garofoli et al., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1421; 116 N.R. 241; 43 O.A.C. 1; 36 Q.A.C. 161; 60 C.C.C.(3d) 161; 80 C.R.(3d) 317; 50 C.R.R. 206, refd to. [para. 40].

Kourtessis v. Minister of National Revenue et al., [1993] 2 S.C.R. 53; 153 N.R. 1; 27 B.C.A.C. 81; 45 W.A.C. 81; [1993] 4 W.W.R. 225; 81 C.C.C.(3d) 286, refd to. [para. 40].

R. v. Power (E.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 601; 165 N.R. 241; 117 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 269; 365 A.P.R. 269; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 29 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265; 74 N.R. 276; [1987] 3 W.W.R. 699; 56 C.R.(3d) 193; 38 D.L.R.(4th) 508; 33 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 13 B.C.L.R.(2d) 1; 28 C.R.R. 122, refd to. [paras. 42, 121].

R. v. Duguay, Murphy and Sevigny, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 93; 91 N.R. 201; 31 O.A.C. 177; 46 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 56 D.L.R.(4th) 46, refd to. [para. 42].

R. v. Stillman (W.W.D.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607; 209 N.R. 81; 185 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 472 A.P.R. 1, refd to. [paras. 42, 66].

R. v. Belnavis (A.) and Lawrence (C.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 341; 216 N.R. 161; 103 O.A.C. 81; 118 C.C.C.(3d) 405, refd to. [para. 42].

R. v. Oickle (R.F.), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 3; 259 N.R. 227; 187 N.S.R.(2d) 201; 585 A.P.R. 201, refd to. [paras. 48, 67].

R. v. Pearson (1957), 117 C.C.C. 249 (Alta. C.A.), refd to. [para. 51].

R. v. Ferrero (1981), 29 A.R. 469; 59 C.C.C.(2d) 93 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 51].

R. v. Ward (1976), 31 C.C.C.(2d) 466 (Ont. H.C.), affd. (1977), 31 C.C.C.(2d) 466 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 51].

R. v. Feeney (M.), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 13; 212 N.R. 83; 91 B.C.A.C. 1; 148 W.A.C. 1; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. 66].

R. v. Caslake (T.L.), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 51; 221 N.R. 281; 123 Man.R.(2d) 208; 159 W.A.C. 208; 121 C.C.C.(3d) 97, refd to. [para. 66].

R. v. Cook (D.R.), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 597; 230 N.R. 83; 112 B.C.A.C. 1; 182 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 66].

R. v. Rothman, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 640; 35 N.R. 485; 59 C.C.C.(2d) 30, refd to. [para. 68].

R. v. Grossi (E.) (1992), 133 A.R. 278 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 70].

R. v. McIntosh (C.) (1999), 128 O.A.C. 69; 141 C.C.C.(3d) 97 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 72].

R. v. Barbeau, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 845; 140 N.R. 211; 75 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. 78].

R. v. L.R. (1995), 100 C.C.C.(3d) 329 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 83].

R. v. George (1991), 50 O.A.C. 391; 5 O.R.(3d) 144 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 92].

R. v. Dawson (W.) et al. (1998), 107 O.A.C. 375; 123 C.C.C.(3d) 385 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 92].

R. v. Arviv (1985), 8 O.A.C. 92; 19 C.C.C.(3d) 395 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [1985] 1 S.C.R. v; 61 N.R. 237; 10 O.A.C. 158; 19 C.C.C.(3d) 395, refd to. [para. 97].

R. v. Ertel (1987), 20 O.A.C. 257; 58 C.R.(3d) 252; 35 C.C.C.(3d) 398; 30 C.R.R. 209 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [1987] 2 S.C.R. vii; 86 N.R. 266; 24 O.A.C. 320, refd to. [para. 97].

R. v. Schwartz, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 673; 8 N.R. 585, refd to. [para. 103].

R. v. Jewitt, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 128; 61 N.R. 159; 21 C.C.C.(3d) 7, refd to. [para. 110].

Watkins v. Olafson et al., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 750; 100 N.R. 161; 61 Man.R.(2d) 81; 61 D.L.R.(4th) 577; [1989] 6 W.W.R. 481; 39 B.C.L.R.(2d) 294, refd to. [para. 114].

R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 32 M.V.R. 153; 45 C.R.(3d) 97; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481, refd to. [para. 121].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 542(1) [para. 5].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Alford, D.G., Some Statistics on the Preliminary Inquiry in Canada (1984), p. vii [para. 87].

Canada, Department of Justice, Do we still need preliminary inquiries? Options for changes to the Criminal Code, Consultation Paper (1994), p. 4 [para. 79].

Del Buono, V.M., Criminal Procedure in Canada (1982), p. 305 [para. 84].

Freedman, Samuel, Admissions and Confessions, in Salhany, Roger E., and Carter, Robert J., Studies in Canadian Criminal Evidence (1972), pp. 95 et seq. [para. 75].

Gold, Alan D., and Presser, Jill R., Let's Not Do Away with the Preliminaries: A Case in Favour of Retaining the Preliminary Inquiry (1996), 1 Can. Crim. L.R. 145, pp. 148 [para. 88]; 154 [para. 94]; 170 [para. 90].

Greenspan, Edward L., and Rosenberg, Marc, The Preliminary Inquiry, in Del Buono, V.M., Criminal Procedure in Canada (1982), p. 305 [para. 84].

Martin, G. Arthur, Preliminary Hearings, in Special Lectures of the Law Society of Upper Canada (1955), pp. 8, 9 [para. 71].

Martin's Annual Criminal Code (2002), p. 907 [para. 56].

Ontario, Report of the Criminal Justice Review Committee (1999), p. 90 [para. 87].

Ontario, Royal Commission Inquiry into Civil Rights, Report No. 1 (1968), vol. 2, pp. 519, 520 [para. 55].

Pomerant, D., and Gilmour, G., A Survey of the Preliminary Inquiry in Canada (1993), pp. 7 [para. 87]; 37, footnote 127 [para. 88].

Salhany, R.E. and Carter, R.J., Studies in Canadian Criminal Evidence (1972), p. 99 [para. 75].

Stuart, Don, Annotation to Mills v. R. (1986), 52 C.R.(3d) 1, pp. 7, 8 [para. 117].

Counsel:

David C. Day, Q.C., for the appellant;

Thomas G. Mills, for the respondent;

S. R. Fainstein, Q.C., and Peter De Freitas, for the intervener, the Attorney General of Canada;

Robert Kelly, for the intervener, the Attorney General for Ontario;

Darrin R. Davis, for the intervener, the Attorney General of Manitoba;

Alexander Budlovsky, for the intervener, the Attorney General of British Columbia;

Written submission only by James A. Bowron for the intervener, the Attorney General for Alberta.

Solicitors of Record:

Lewis, Day, St. John's, Newfoundland, for the appellant;

Department of Justice, St. John's, Newfoundland, for the respondent;

Attorney General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, for the intervener, the Attorney General of Canada;

Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto, Ontario, for the intervener, the Attorney General for Ontario;

Department of Justice, Winnipeg, Manitoba, for the intervener, the Attorney General of Manitoba;

Ministry of the Attorney General, Vancouver, British Columbia, for the intervener, the Attorney General of British Columbia;

Department of Justice, Edmonton, Alberta, for the intervener, the Attorney General for Alberta.

This appeal was heard on February 13, 2001, by McLachlin, C.J.C., L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Supreme Court of Canada delivered the following decision in both official languages on December 6, 2001, which included the following opinions:

McLachlin, C.J.C. (L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Bastarache and LeBel, JJ., concurring) - see paragraphs 1 to 50;

Major, J. (Iacobucci, Binnie and Arbour, JJ., concurring), dissenting - see paragraphs 51 to 125.

To continue reading

Request your trial

Subscribers can access the reported version of this case.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see a list of all the cited cases and legislation of a document.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see the revised versions of legislation with amendments.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. An alternative to lists of cases, the Precedent Map makes it easier to establish which ones may be of most relevance to your research and prioritise further reading. You also get a useful overview of how the case was received.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

Subscribers are able to see the list of results connected to your document through the topics and citations Vincent found.

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Request your trial

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
Thousands of Data Sources

Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
Find What You Need, Quickly

Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
Over 2 million registered users

Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.

109 practice notes

R. v. Hynes, 2001 SCC 82
- Canada
- Supreme Court (Canada)
- December 6, 2001
...data-vids="">111 cases, 51 other sources R. v. Hynes, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623, 2001 SCC 82 Dwayne W. Hynes Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen Respondent and The Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General for Ontario, the Attorney General of Manitoba, the Attorney General of British Columb......
R. v. Conway (P.), (2010) 402 N.R. 255 (SCC)
- Canada
- Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
- June 11, 2010
...Inc. et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; 279 N.R. 345; 154 O.A.C. 345; 2001 SCC 81, refd to. [para. 4]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 2001 SCC 82, refd to. [para. R. v. Menard (P.L.) (2008), 263 B.C.A.C. 167; 443 W.A.C. 167; 24......
R. v. Conway (P.), (2010) 263 O.A.C. 61 (SCC)
- Canada
- Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
- June 11, 2010
...Inc. et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; 279 N.R. 345; 154 O.A.C. 345; 2001 SCC 81, refd to. [para. 4]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 2001 SCC 82, refd to. [para. R. v. Menard (P.L.) (2008), 263 B.C.A.C. 167; 443 W.A.C. 167; 24......
M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2015] N.R. TBEd. DE.014
- Canada
- Supreme Court (Canada)
- December 11, 2015
...justice, may grant Charter remedies that pertain directly to the circumscribed issues relevant to committal: see, e.g., R. v. Hynes , 2001 SCC 82, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; United States of America v. Kwok , 2001 SCC 18, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 532. The second is that the extradition judge, unlike the p......

Request a trial to view additional results

87 cases

R. v. Conway (P.), (2010) 263 O.A.C. 61 (SCC)
- Canada
- Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
- June 11, 2010
...Inc. et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; 279 N.R. 345; 154 O.A.C. 345; 2001 SCC 81, refd to. [para. 4]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 2001 SCC 82, refd to. [para. R. v. Menard (P.L.) (2008), 263 B.C.A.C. 167; 443 W.A.C. 167; 24......
R. v. S.J.L.-G. et al., (2009) 386 N.R. 1 (SCC)
- Canada
- Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
- March 27, 2009
...O.A.C. 85, refd to. [para. 11]. Criminal Code, In re (1910), 43 S.C.R. 434, refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 2001 SCC 82, refd to. [paras. 21, 89]. R. v. Sazant (M.), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 635; 348 N.R. 1; 21......
R. v. Hynes (D.W.), 2001 SCC 82
- Canada
- Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
- December 6, 2001
...The Attorney General of Manitoba, The Attorney General of British Columbia and The Attorney General for Alberta (interveners) (27443; 2001 SCC 82) Indexed R. v. Hynes (D.W.) Supreme Court of Canada McLachlin, C.J.C., L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and......
M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice), (2015) 480 N.R. 1 (SCC)
- Canada
- Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
- March 17, 2015
...241; 28 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [paras. 38, 210]. McVey, Re - see United States of America v. McVey. R. v. Hynes (D.W.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 2001 SCC 82, refd to. [para. 40]. United States of America v. Kwok, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 532; 267......

Request a trial to view additional results

22 books & journal articles

Table of cases
- Canada
- Irwin Books Youth Criminal Justice Law. Third Edition
- June 18, 2012
...(4th) 577, 127 C.C.C. (3d) 449 .................................................................................... 282 R. v. Hynes, 2001 SCC 82, 159 C.C.C. (3d) 359, 206 D.L.R. (4th) 483 ............. 666 R. v. I.(L.R.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 504, 109 D.L.R. (4th) 140, 86 C.C.C. (3d) 289 .............
Table of cases
- Canada
- Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
- June 23, 2020
...BCSC 1306 ............................................................................. 385 R v Hynes, [2001] 3 SCR 623, 159 CCC (3d) 359, 2001 SCC 82 .......................................... 69, 389, 393, 396, 401, 403, 488, 498 R v I(SP) (2005), 27 CR (6th) 112, 193 CCC (3d) 240, 2005 N......
Table of cases, index and about the authors
- Canada
- Irwin Books The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Seventh Edition
- June 30, 2021
...335 R v Hundal, [1993] 1 SCR 867, 79 CCC (3d) 97................................................. 313 R v Hynes, [2001] 3 SCR 623, 2001 SCC 82, 206 DLR (4th) 483....................... 139 R v Jarvis, [2002] 3 SCR 757, 2002 SCC 73, 219 DLR (4th) 233...................61, 333 R v Jarvis, 201......
Table of cases
- Canada
- Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Sixth Edition
- June 22, 2017
...69, 318 R v Hundal, [1993] 1 SCR 867, 79 CCC (3d) 97 ................................................ 298 R v Hynes, [2001] 3 SCR 623, 2001 SCC 82, 206 DLR (4th) 483 ...................... 130 R v Jarvis, [2002] 3 SCR 757, 2002 SCC 73, 219 DLR (4th) 233 ..................58, 317 R v Johnson......

Request a trial to view additional results

R. v. Hynes (D.W.), (2001) 278 N.R. 299 (SCC)

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users

You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.

Why Sign-up to vLex?

Over 100 Countries

Thousands of Data Sources

Find What You Need, Quickly

Over 2 million registered users