R. v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Mr. Justice Savage,The Honourable Madam Justice Dickson |
| Date | 25 April 2017 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA42918 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R. v. Vallee,
...is intelligible and the reasons are capable of meaningful appellate review: R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24 at para. 30; R. v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162 at para. 39. We consider this principle applies to the issue of the cell plant [84] We observe that the mistrial application occupied a week. The d......
-
R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24
...factual matters are not misapprehensions but simple disagreement with the judge’s differing view of the evidence. [48] In R. v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162, Dickson J.A. surveyed the jurisprudence in relation to the review of credibility findings on appeal and the circumstances in which an error ......
-
R. v. Ruffell, 2019 BCSC 1595
...10: H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 25 at para. 89. [17] As stated in R. v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162 at para. 37, substantial deference is owed to trial judges with regard to findings of fact, particularly where they relate to witness credi......
-
R. v. Zora, 2018 BCCA 230
...findings were central to her credibility assessment and reasoning process leading to Mr. Zora’s convictions: R v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162, para. 40; R v. Shen, 2010 BCCA 554, paras. 27-29; R v. Rohani, 2012 BCCA 198, paras. 40-45. As a result, the Crown agrees the a......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R. v. Vallee,
...is intelligible and the reasons are capable of meaningful appellate review: R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24 at para. 30; R. v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162 at para. 39. We consider this principle applies to the issue of the cell plant [84] We observe that the mistrial application occupied a week. The d......
-
R. v. Charlie, 2020 BCCA 24
...factual matters are not misapprehensions but simple disagreement with the judge’s differing view of the evidence. [48] In R. v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162, Dickson J.A. surveyed the jurisprudence in relation to the review of credibility findings on appeal and the circumstances in which an error ......
-
R. v. Ruffell, 2019 BCSC 1595
...10: H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 25 at para. 89. [17] As stated in R. v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162 at para. 37, substantial deference is owed to trial judges with regard to findings of fact, particularly where they relate to witness credi......
-
R. v. Zora, 2018 BCCA 230
...findings were central to her credibility assessment and reasoning process leading to Mr. Zora’s convictions: R v. J.F.D., 2017 BCCA 162, para. 40; R v. Shen, 2010 BCCA 554, paras. 27-29; R v. Rohani, 2012 BCCA 198, paras. 40-45. As a result, the Crown agrees the a......
Request a trial to view additional results