R. v. J.L., 2018 ONCA 756
| Judge | Pepall, Lauwers and Fairburn JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Case Date | September 19, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | 2018 ONCA 756 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...leave to appeal ref’d [2007] SCCA No 69 .....................................................................................688 R v JL, 2018 ONCA 756 ...................................................................................40, 41 R v John, 2016 ONCA 615, leave to appeal ref’d [20......
-
The Basics of Admissibility and the Evaluation of Evidence
...41 R v Quartey , 2018 ABCA 12, aff’d [2018] 3 SCR 687 at para 3. 42 R v ARJD SCC, above note 36 at para 2 [emphasis added]. 43 R v JL , 2018 ONCA 756 at para 46. The Basics of Admissibility and the Evaluation of Ev idence 41 The appeal court in R v JL found that inference to be unreasonable......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 17 21, 2018)
...Doherty and Roberts JJ.A.] Counsel: Dorsz, for the appellant Elmasry, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Endorsement v. J.L., 2018 ONCA 756 [Pepall, Lauwers and Fairburn JJ.A.] Counsel: Wickramasinghe and Z. Kerbel, for the appellant Hotke, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law,......
-
R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
...judge should not have used an unfounded assumption to evaluate the credibility of Mr. Paulos” (at para 34). [80] Similarly, in R v J.L., 2018 ONCA 756 at para 47, 367 CCC (3d) 249, Pepall J.A. observed that “relying upon assumptions about what [a complainant] will and will not do may impact......
Request a trial to view additional results
28 cases
-
R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
...judge should not have used an unfounded assumption to evaluate the credibility of Mr. Paulos” (at para 34). [80] Similarly, in R v J.L., 2018 ONCA 756 at para 47, 367 CCC (3d) 249, Pepall J.A. observed that “relying upon assumptions about what [a complainant] will and will not do may impact......
-
R. v. J.R.G, 2020 ONSC 841
...v. Lacombe 2019 ONCA 938; R. v. Cepic, 2019 ONCA 541, [2019] O.J. No. 3398; R. v. A.B.A., 2019 ONCA 124, 145 O.R. (3d) 634; R. v. J.L., 2018 ONCA 756, 143 O.R. (3d) 170. Also see R. v. Senthamilselvan, 2019 ONSC 3884, [2019] O.J. No. [69] The arguments in this trial illustrate how thinking ......
-
L.C. v. K.T., 2018 NSCA 92
...credibility: see, for example, R. v. Brame, 2004 YKCA 13; R. v. A.R.J.D., 2018 SCC 6 aff’g R. v. A.R.J.D., 2017 ABCA 237; R. v. J.L., 2018 ONCA 756 at ¶47. The central issues before the judge were whether leave should be granted and the best interests of the child, and not the credibility o......
-
R. v. Battisti, 2019 ONSC 4091
...pp. 18-19. See also Trial Transcript, at pp. 33-34. [37] Ibid., at para. 19, p. 20. [38] Trial Transcript, at pp. 85-86. [39] R. v. J.L., 2018 ONCA 756, 143 O.R. (3d) 170, 367 C.C.C. (3d) 249, at paras. 39-40. See also R. v. T.(D.), 2014 ONCA 44, 305 C.C.C. (3) 526, at para. [40] Trial Tran......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 17 21, 2018)
...Doherty and Roberts JJ.A.] Counsel: Dorsz, for the appellant Elmasry, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Endorsement v. J.L., 2018 ONCA 756 [Pepall, Lauwers and Fairburn JJ.A.] Counsel: Wickramasinghe and Z. Kerbel, for the appellant Hotke, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law,......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...leave to appeal ref’d [2007] SCCA No 69 .....................................................................................688 R v JL, 2018 ONCA 756 ...................................................................................40, 41 R v John, 2016 ONCA 615, leave to appeal ref’d [20......
-
The Basics of Admissibility and the Evaluation of Evidence
...41 R v Quartey , 2018 ABCA 12, aff’d [2018] 3 SCR 687 at para 3. 42 R v ARJD SCC, above note 36 at para 2 [emphasis added]. 43 R v JL , 2018 ONCA 756 at para 46. The Basics of Admissibility and the Evaluation of Ev idence 41 The appeal court in R v JL found that inference to be unreasonable......
-
Convicted On Sexism: How Does Sexist Reasoning In Favour Of The Complainant Work In Today's #Metoo Culture?
...R. v. J.L. 2018 ONCA 756, The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of an accused who was convicted of sexual assault. The trial judge convicted the accused because he felt that the complainant would not engage in the acts as described by the accused because she was a young woman. The ......