R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359

JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Patricia Rowbotham,The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Crighton
Citation2019 ABCA 359
Date30 September 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Docket Number1701-0333-A
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 6, 2022
    ...R. v. Nikkel, 2009 MBCA 8, 240 Man. R. (2d) 1; R. v. Fitts, 2015 ONCJ 746; R. v. MacIsaac, 2018 ONCA 650, 141 O.R. (3d) 721; R. v. JEV, 2019 ABCA 359, 381 C.C.C. (3d) 392; R. v. J.A.L., 2019 ABCA 415; Gakmakge v. R., 2017 QCCS 3279; Masson v. R., 2019 QCCS 2953, 57 C.R. (7th) 415; R. v. Ric......
  • R v TWS, 2020 ABCA 157
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 23, 2020
    ...be extended in the case of retrials and mistrials. The case management judge did not have the benefit of this court’s reasons in R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359 and R v JAL, 2019 ABCA 415, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38983 (26 March 2020) where this court held that the constitutional clock start......
  • R v Way,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 4, 2022
    ...is also owed to a trial judge’s findings as to the parties’ procedural conduct and the complexity of the case: R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359 at para 22, 381 CCC (3d) 392 [JEV]; R v Regan, 2018 ABCA 55 at paras 32-33, 359 CCC (3d) [10]        Similar......
  • R v Srianandan, 2019 ABQB 805
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 18, 2019
    ...judge’s decision. In doing so, the Crown did not render the preliminary inquiry as a waste of time or resources. Indeed, in R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359, the Court of Appeal reminded us that the passage of time is not automatically to be equated to delay. At paragraph 27 of the majority decision ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 6, 2022
    ...R. v. Nikkel, 2009 MBCA 8, 240 Man. R. (2d) 1; R. v. Fitts, 2015 ONCJ 746; R. v. MacIsaac, 2018 ONCA 650, 141 O.R. (3d) 721; R. v. JEV, 2019 ABCA 359, 381 C.C.C. (3d) 392; R. v. J.A.L., 2019 ABCA 415; Gakmakge v. R., 2017 QCCS 3279; Masson v. R., 2019 QCCS 2953, 57 C.R. (7th) 415; R. v. Ric......
  • R v TWS, 2020 ABCA 157
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 23, 2020
    ...be extended in the case of retrials and mistrials. The case management judge did not have the benefit of this court’s reasons in R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359 and R v JAL, 2019 ABCA 415, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38983 (26 March 2020) where this court held that the constitutional clock start......
  • R v Way,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 4, 2022
    ...is also owed to a trial judge’s findings as to the parties’ procedural conduct and the complexity of the case: R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359 at para 22, 381 CCC (3d) 392 [JEV]; R v Regan, 2018 ABCA 55 at paras 32-33, 359 CCC (3d) [10]        Similar......
  • R v Srianandan, 2019 ABQB 805
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 18, 2019
    ...judge’s decision. In doing so, the Crown did not render the preliminary inquiry as a waste of time or resources. Indeed, in R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359, the Court of Appeal reminded us that the passage of time is not automatically to be equated to delay. At paragraph 27 of the majority decision ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT