R. v. De Jong (S.R.), 2016 ABQB 116
| Judge | Manderscheid, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,POLICE |
| Citation | 2016 ABQB 116 |
| Date | 26 February 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Richards (C.B.), 2016 ABQB 176
...which a reasonable person could infer that there were reasonable and probable grounds to make the arrest. [40] Recently in R v De Jong, 2016 ABQB 116, Justice Manderscheid stated at para 59: The objective standard for examining the officer's subjective belief requires the Court to consider:......
-
R v Stephanie Harrison, 2017 MBPC 2
...officers, that an appropriate remedy would be a reduction in sentence as was used in R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6, and R. v. DeJong, 2016 ABQB 116. In Nasogaluak the Supreme Court at paragraph 32 stated, “While, at times, the police may have to resort to force in order to complete an......
2 cases
-
R. v. Richards (C.B.), 2016 ABQB 176
...which a reasonable person could infer that there were reasonable and probable grounds to make the arrest. [40] Recently in R v De Jong, 2016 ABQB 116, Justice Manderscheid stated at para 59: The objective standard for examining the officer's subjective belief requires the Court to consider:......
-
R v Stephanie Harrison, 2017 MBPC 2
...officers, that an appropriate remedy would be a reduction in sentence as was used in R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6, and R. v. DeJong, 2016 ABQB 116. In Nasogaluak the Supreme Court at paragraph 32 stated, “While, at times, the police may have to resort to force in order to complete an......