R. v. Richards (C.B.), 2016 ABQB 176
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Hunt McDonald, J. |
| Citation | 2016 ABQB 176 |
| Date | 22 March 2016 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,POLICE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
...112; Channa , supra note 131 at paras 33, 34; Nelson , supra note 169 at para 20; Simard , supra note 187 at paras 59-63; R v Richards , 2016 ABQB 176 at paras 130, 131; Musa , supra note 125 at paras 130-34. © 2025 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 11 Right to Cou......
-
Table of Cases
...265 © 2025 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Table of Cases 451 Richards , R v , 2016 ABQB 176 ................................................. 386 Richards , R v , 1999 CanLII 1602 (ONCA) .............................. 112-13, 118, 161 Rizvi , R v , 2023 ONSC 1443 ............
-
R v Deng-Truong
...for a drug trafficking arrest: See R v Caravaggio, 2012 ONCA 248; R v Parchment, 2007 BCCA 326; R v Phung, 2013 ABCA 63; R v Richards, 2016 ABQB 176 and R v Lam, 2016 ABQB 77 In the context of search warrants, informant information, combined with some corroboration, even corroboration of no......
-
R v Alleyne
...source on the material information they supply as a whole and not on each and every piece of evidence provided: R. v. Richards, 2016 ABQB 176, 35 Alta. L.R. (6th) 354, at para. 92; R. v. Guthrie, 2018 ONSC 788, at para. 12; R. v. Russell, 2012 BCSC 1801, at para. 82; R. v. Saunders, 2003 NL......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
R. v. Brammall
...on the material information they supply as a whole and not on each and every piece of evidence provided. See also: R. v. Richards, 2016 ABQB 176, 35 Alta. L.R. (6th) 354, at para. 92; R. v. Guthrie, 2018 ONSC 788, at para. 12; R. v. Russell, 2012 BCSC 1801, at para. 82; R. v. Saunders, 2003......
-
R v Bailey
...be destroyed if he was allowed to make a phone call. Police justifications must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. In R v Richards, 2016 ABQB 176, Justice Hunt McDonald discussed police justifications for delays in providing access to counsel at paras 110 – 112. If the security of the pol......
-
R v Daigle
...[15]           Next is a decision of the Court of Queen’s Bench in R v Richards, 2016 ABQB 176 [Richards], which contains some insightful passages about reviewing ITOs. There are some lengthy passages, but the record ought to be clear......
2 books & journal articles
-
Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
...112; Channa , supra note 131 at paras 33, 34; Nelson , supra note 169 at para 20; Simard , supra note 187 at paras 59-63; R v Richards , 2016 ABQB 176 at paras 130, 131; Musa , supra note 125 at paras 130-34. © 2025 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 11 Right to Cou......
-
Table of Cases
...265 © 2025 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Table of Cases 451 Richards , R v , 2016 ABQB 176 ................................................. 386 Richards , R v , 1999 CanLII 1602 (ONCA) .............................. 112-13, 118, 161 Rizvi , R v , 2023 ONSC 1443 ............