R. v. Jordan (G.V.),

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeRomilly, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation2014 BCSC 1887,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1887,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1887 (SC)
Date06 October 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Lui (M.C.L.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 10, 2014
    ...for these type of offences [38] I have previously canvassed the sentencing precedents for this type of offence in R. v. Jordan , 2014 BCSC 1887. I have also canvassed these precedents in R. v. Kumar , 2013 BCSC 2171. Under those circumstances I do not believe that is necessary to repeat her......
  • R. v. Harrower
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 11, 2021
    ...I turn now to the cases referred to by defence. Counsel for the accused referred to the following authorities: R. v. Jordan, 2014 BCSC 1887; R. v. Chamberlain, 2016 BCSC 379; R. v. Carrillo, 2015 BCCA 192; R. v. Tse, 2010 BCSC 1273; and R. v. Lai, 2018 BCSC [51]    &#xA0......
  • R. v. Dutchak
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 27, 2018
    ...weight”, see R. v. Hodson (1927), 20 Cr. App. R. 11, and the other cases cited by Justice Romilly at para. 43 of R. v. Jordan, 2014 BCSC 1887. [28]        Mr. Dutchak is currently before the court, according to the probation officer, on an outs......
3 cases
  • R. v. Lui (M.C.L.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 10, 2014
    ...for these type of offences [38] I have previously canvassed the sentencing precedents for this type of offence in R. v. Jordan , 2014 BCSC 1887. I have also canvassed these precedents in R. v. Kumar , 2013 BCSC 2171. Under those circumstances I do not believe that is necessary to repeat her......
  • R. v. Harrower
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 11, 2021
    ...I turn now to the cases referred to by defence. Counsel for the accused referred to the following authorities: R. v. Jordan, 2014 BCSC 1887; R. v. Chamberlain, 2016 BCSC 379; R. v. Carrillo, 2015 BCCA 192; R. v. Tse, 2010 BCSC 1273; and R. v. Lai, 2018 BCSC [51]    &#xA0......
  • R. v. Dutchak
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 27, 2018
    ...weight”, see R. v. Hodson (1927), 20 Cr. App. R. 11, and the other cases cited by Justice Romilly at para. 43 of R. v. Jordan, 2014 BCSC 1887. [28]        Mr. Dutchak is currently before the court, according to the probation officer, on an outs......