R v Klaus, 2019 ABCA 483
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Myra Bielby,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz |
| Citation | 2019 ABCA 483 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 11 December 2019 |
| Docket Number | 1801-0041-A; 1801-0072-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
R v Garland,
...would run concurrently. The appeals of Klaus and Frank from conviction were also earlier dismissed by this Court: R v Klaus and Frank, 2019 ABCA 483, [2019] AJ No 1669 (QL). In Klaus and Frank, the Crown challenged the trial judge’s exercise of discretion to direct that the parole ineligibi......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...Another recent explanation, to similar effect, is found in R v Klaus, 2019 ABCA 483 at para 14 There are a number of exceptions to the hearsay rule, one of them being that statements against interest by an accused are admissible against him. This exception, in effect, overrides t......
-
R. v. Wentworth,
...the statements are relevant and probative “through inferences other than that repetition indicates accuracy”: R. v. Klaus 2019 ABCA 483, at para. 11, citing R. v. M.C., 2014 ONCA 611, 314 C.C.C. (3d) 336, at para. 60. As noted in M.C., at para. 60, “[t]ypically, the exc......
-
R v Laberge,
...prior consistent statements can be gleaned from the following authorities: R v Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24; R v Ellard, 2009 SCC 27; R v Klaus, 2019 ABCA 483; and most recently R v SKM, 2021 ABCA Credibility of the Accused [557] In R v Sinclair, 2016 ABPC 75, this Court at ......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
R v Garland,
...would run concurrently. The appeals of Klaus and Frank from conviction were also earlier dismissed by this Court: R v Klaus and Frank, 2019 ABCA 483, [2019] AJ No 1669 (QL). In Klaus and Frank, the Crown challenged the trial judge’s exercise of discretion to direct that the parole ineligibi......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...Another recent explanation, to similar effect, is found in R v Klaus, 2019 ABCA 483 at para 14 There are a number of exceptions to the hearsay rule, one of them being that statements against interest by an accused are admissible against him. This exception, in effect, overrides t......
-
R. v. Wentworth,
...the statements are relevant and probative “through inferences other than that repetition indicates accuracy”: R. v. Klaus 2019 ABCA 483, at para. 11, citing R. v. M.C., 2014 ONCA 611, 314 C.C.C. (3d) 336, at para. 60. As noted in M.C., at para. 60, “[t]ypically, the exc......
-
R v Laberge,
...prior consistent statements can be gleaned from the following authorities: R v Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24; R v Ellard, 2009 SCC 27; R v Klaus, 2019 ABCA 483; and most recently R v SKM, 2021 ABCA Credibility of the Accused [557] In R v Sinclair, 2016 ABPC 75, this Court at ......
Request a trial to view additional results