R. v. Langan, 2019 BCCA 467
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman,The Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie,The Honourable Madam Justice Stromberg‑Stein |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 467 |
| Date | 19 December 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA45613 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 practice notes
-
R. v. F.I.,
...In R v Langan, 2019 BCCA 467, 383 CCC (3d) 516, the accused was convicted of sexual assault but appealed on the basis that the trial judge improperly relied upon the text messages between him and the complainant after the alleged interaction. Bauman C.J.B.C. held as 99 It is well-esta......
-
R. v. C.M.M., 2020 BCCA 56
...has been properly admitted does not insulate that statement from review. The trial judge must also ensure its proper use: R. v. Langan, 2019 BCCA 467 at para. [153] Ellard makes clear that statements admitted to rebut an allegation of recent fabrication must be used for that purpose and “no......
-
R. v. Drysdale,
...set aside on appeal, endorsing the reasons of a dissenting justice. 78 In R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33, rev'g 2019 BCCA 467, 383 C.C.C. (3d) 516, this Court adopted the dissenting reasons of Bauman C.J.B.C. that held that the trial judge's ambiguous use......
-
R. v. C.R.S., 2020 BCSC 95
...911 call. However, the 911 call is a prior consistent statement that cannot corroborate the complainant’s identification: R. v. Langan, 2019 BCCA 467 at paras. 42, 44–50. If the complainant was honestly mistaken in her identification at the time of the shooting, she would have been equally ......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
-
R. v. F.I.,
...In R v Langan, 2019 BCCA 467, 383 CCC (3d) 516, the accused was convicted of sexual assault but appealed on the basis that the trial judge improperly relied upon the text messages between him and the complainant after the alleged interaction. Bauman C.J.B.C. held as 99 It is well-esta......
-
R. v. C.M.M., 2020 BCCA 56
...has been properly admitted does not insulate that statement from review. The trial judge must also ensure its proper use: R. v. Langan, 2019 BCCA 467 at para. [153] Ellard makes clear that statements admitted to rebut an allegation of recent fabrication must be used for that purpose and “no......
-
R. v. Drysdale,
...set aside on appeal, endorsing the reasons of a dissenting justice. 78 In R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33, rev'g 2019 BCCA 467, 383 C.C.C. (3d) 516, this Court adopted the dissenting reasons of Bauman C.J.B.C. that held that the trial judge's ambiguous use......
-
R. v. C.R.S., 2020 BCSC 95
...911 call. However, the 911 call is a prior consistent statement that cannot corroborate the complainant’s identification: R. v. Langan, 2019 BCCA 467 at paras. 42, 44–50. If the complainant was honestly mistaken in her identification at the time of the shooting, she would have been equally ......
Request a trial to view additional results