R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeCaldwell,Whitmore,Leurer
Citation2019 SKCA 5
Date15 January 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACR2824
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 practice notes
  • R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 16 October 2019
    ...the inferences drawn by the trial judge, having regard to the standard of proof, were reasonably open to him or her. [74] In R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5, Caldwell J.A. summarized the legal principles set out in Villaroman regarding circumstantial evidence, and the standard of appellate review......
  • R v Wolfe,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 16 March 2021
    ...evidence case is not rendered unreasonable merely because the evidence is capable of giving rise to competing inferences (R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5 at para 26 [Learning]). A trier of fact must consider other plausible theories and reasonable possibilities that arise from the evidence or lac......
  • Digest: R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 15 January 2019
    ...as: 2019 SKCA 5 Docket Number: CACR 2824 , CA19004 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-01-15 Judges: Caldwell Whitmore Leurer Subjects: Criminal Law � Controlled Drugs and Substances Act � Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking � Cocaine � Conviction � Appeal Digest: The appellant appealed......
  • R v Smith, 2019 SKCA 100
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 8 October 2019
    ...kg cocaine part of Palfrey operation courier (5 loads), no record and 23 yrs old ($20 million to $57 million in value) 9 yrs R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5 30 kg cocaine part of Palfrey operation courier, no record and 27 yrs old ($1.2 million and $2.3 million in [44] For those individuals less ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
  • R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 16 October 2019
    ...the inferences drawn by the trial judge, having regard to the standard of proof, were reasonably open to him or her. [74] In R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5, Caldwell J.A. summarized the legal principles set out in Villaroman regarding circumstantial evidence, and the standard of appellate review......
  • R v Wolfe,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 16 March 2021
    ...evidence case is not rendered unreasonable merely because the evidence is capable of giving rise to competing inferences (R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5 at para 26 [Learning]). A trier of fact must consider other plausible theories and reasonable possibilities that arise from the evidence or lac......
  • R v Smith, 2019 SKCA 100
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 8 October 2019
    ...kg cocaine part of Palfrey operation courier (5 loads), no record and 23 yrs old ($20 million to $57 million in value) 9 yrs R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5 30 kg cocaine part of Palfrey operation courier, no record and 27 yrs old ($1.2 million and $2.3 million in [44] For those individuals less ......
  • R v McKay, 2019 SKCA 129
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 29 November 2019
    ...Larsen, 2012 SKQB 345, 404 Sask R 246 (aff’d in Palfrey); R v Swanson, 2012 SKQB 485, 408 Sask R 255 (aff’d in Palfrey); and R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5. Those sentences ranged from 9 years, for trafficking in 30 kilograms of cocaine as a courier (Mr. Learning), to 18 years, for trafficking i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: R v Learning, 2019 SKCA 5
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 15 January 2019
    ...as: 2019 SKCA 5 Docket Number: CACR 2824 , CA19004 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-01-15 Judges: Caldwell Whitmore Leurer Subjects: Criminal Law � Controlled Drugs and Substances Act � Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking � Cocaine � Conviction � Appeal Digest: The appellant appealed......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT