R. v. Learning, 2019 BCCA 332
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Mr. Justice Hunter |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 332 |
| Date | 19 September 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA44636 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65
...the principles of denunciation, deterrence, and protection of the public are given pre-eminent consideration: see R. v. Learning, 2019 BCCA 332 at para. [61] In Nur, Chief Justice McLachlin observed that mandatory minimum penalties are a “blunt instrument” that can deprive courts of the abi......
-
R. v. Tamoikin, 2020 NSCA 43
...of offences. It has been concisely adopted and explained in R. v. Johnson, 2012 ONCA 339 at para. 19 (applied in R. v. Learning, 2019 BCCA 332; R. v. Park, 2016 MBCA 107; see also R. v. Markie, 2009 NSCA 54. Importantly, it is only the unexpired portion of the unrelated sentence that should......
-
R. v. Burke,
...the effect of the totality principle is tempered by the continuing criminality of the offender: Johnson, at para. 31. In R. v. Learning, 2019 BCCA 332, at paras. 25, 29-31, the British Columbia Court of Appeal held that sentencing judges should consider previous or current sentences when as......
-
R. v. Peric,
... and that in its totality, the sentence is not unduly long or harsh, see R. v. M.(C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500, R. v. Learning, [2019] BCCA 332, and in s. 718.2(c) of the Criminal Code. Given that, in combination, these are the first penitentiary sentences that Mr. Peric has receiv......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65
...the principles of denunciation, deterrence, and protection of the public are given pre-eminent consideration: see R. v. Learning, 2019 BCCA 332 at para. [61] In Nur, Chief Justice McLachlin observed that mandatory minimum penalties are a “blunt instrument” that can deprive courts of the abi......
-
R. v. Tamoikin, 2020 NSCA 43
...of offences. It has been concisely adopted and explained in R. v. Johnson, 2012 ONCA 339 at para. 19 (applied in R. v. Learning, 2019 BCCA 332; R. v. Park, 2016 MBCA 107; see also R. v. Markie, 2009 NSCA 54. Importantly, it is only the unexpired portion of the unrelated sentence that should......
-
R. v. Burke,
...the effect of the totality principle is tempered by the continuing criminality of the offender: Johnson, at para. 31. In R. v. Learning, 2019 BCCA 332, at paras. 25, 29-31, the British Columbia Court of Appeal held that sentencing judges should consider previous or current sentences when as......
-
R. v. Peric,
... and that in its totality, the sentence is not unduly long or harsh, see R. v. M.(C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500, R. v. Learning, [2019] BCCA 332, and in s. 718.2(c) of the Criminal Code. Given that, in combination, these are the first penitentiary sentences that Mr. Peric has receiv......
Request a trial to view additional results