R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Mr. Justice J.D. Bruce McDonald,The Honourable Madam Justice Myra Bielby |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 324 |
| Date | 04 October 2018 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 1703-0089-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73
...provide an essential direction in a jury instruction is a question of law subject to review on a standard of correctness: R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324 at para 18, 366 CCC (3d) 213 [15] A reviewing court takes a functional approach by reviewing the entire charge in the context of the trial a......
-
R v TWS, 2020 ABCA 157
...the charge as a whole, in determining, in a general sense, what the words used in the charge likely conveyed to the jury: R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324 at para 18 and the cases cited therein. An accused is entitled to a properly instructed jury, not a perfectly instructed one: R v Jacquard, ......
-
R v RJM, 2019 ABCA 386
...and the charge as a whole, in determining in a general sense what the words used in a charge likely conveyed to the jury: R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324 at para 18. An accused is entitled to a properly instructed jury, not a perfectly instructed one: R v Daley, 2007 SCC 53 at para 31; R v Ara......
-
R v Heymerdinguer,
...jury charge is a question of law, an “accused is entitled to a properly instructed jury, not a perfectly instructed jury”: R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324 at paras 18-21, 366 CCC (3d) VI. Analysis The trial judge did not err in the assessment and application of the air of reality test [38] The......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
R v JOL, 2020 ABCA 73
...provide an essential direction in a jury instruction is a question of law subject to review on a standard of correctness: R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324 at para 18, 366 CCC (3d) 213 [15] A reviewing court takes a functional approach by reviewing the entire charge in the context of the trial a......
-
R v TWS, 2020 ABCA 157
...the charge as a whole, in determining, in a general sense, what the words used in the charge likely conveyed to the jury: R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324 at para 18 and the cases cited therein. An accused is entitled to a properly instructed jury, not a perfectly instructed one: R v Jacquard, ......
-
R v RJM, 2019 ABCA 386
...and the charge as a whole, in determining in a general sense what the words used in a charge likely conveyed to the jury: R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324 at para 18. An accused is entitled to a properly instructed jury, not a perfectly instructed one: R v Daley, 2007 SCC 53 at para 31; R v Ara......
-
R v Heymerdinguer,
...jury charge is a question of law, an “accused is entitled to a properly instructed jury, not a perfectly instructed jury”: R v Lightning, 2018 ABCA 324 at paras 18-21, 366 CCC (3d) VI. Analysis The trial judge did not err in the assessment and application of the air of reality test [38] The......
Request a trial to view additional results