R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 1846
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | CHRISTIE |
| Docket Number | CR-18-04996-0000 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 25 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 practice notes
-
R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674
...WhatsApp messages. Therefore, the Applicant was not required to disclose them in advance to the Crown or complainant. See: R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 1846 12) Having ruled as it did, however, the court was clear that there was no ruling on the actual admissibility or the use of the communication......
-
R. v. N.K.,
...that I should follow the procedure for this application as set out by Lynch J. in R. v. Whitehouse, 2020 NSSC 87, and in R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 1846, where Christie J. [70] This court suggests the following procedure be followed where the def......
-
R. v. M.L.,
...evidentiary hearing under s. 278.94. (R. v. Ecker, 96 C.C.C. (3d) 161 (Sask. C.A.); R. v. B.B., [2009] O.J. No. 862 (S.C.J.), R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 1846 at para. 28; R. v. Barakat, [2019] O.J. No. 705 at para. 18 (C.J.); R. v. J.S, 2011 ONSC [12] The firs......
-
R. v. Nirlungayuk,
...privilege or confidential informants. [27] The procedure set out in WM has been adopted in Ontario (see: R v Mai, 2019 ONSC 6691; R v AM, 2020 ONSC 1846; R v White, 2020 ONSC [28] As can be seen, overall, the jurisprudence to date protects the rights of the accused by either striking down t......
Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
-
R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 7674
...WhatsApp messages. Therefore, the Applicant was not required to disclose them in advance to the Crown or complainant. See: R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 1846 12) Having ruled as it did, however, the court was clear that there was no ruling on the actual admissibility or the use of the communication......
-
R. v. N.K.,
...that I should follow the procedure for this application as set out by Lynch J. in R. v. Whitehouse, 2020 NSSC 87, and in R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 1846, where Christie J. [70] This court suggests the following procedure be followed where the def......
-
R. v. M.L.,
...evidentiary hearing under s. 278.94. (R. v. Ecker, 96 C.C.C. (3d) 161 (Sask. C.A.); R. v. B.B., [2009] O.J. No. 862 (S.C.J.), R. v. A.M., 2020 ONSC 1846 at para. 28; R. v. Barakat, [2019] O.J. No. 705 at para. 18 (C.J.); R. v. J.S, 2011 ONSC [12] The firs......
-
R. v. Nirlungayuk,
...privilege or confidential informants. [27] The procedure set out in WM has been adopted in Ontario (see: R v Mai, 2019 ONSC 6691; R v AM, 2020 ONSC 1846; R v White, 2020 ONSC [28] As can be seen, overall, the jurisprudence to date protects the rights of the accused by either striking down t......
Request a trial to view additional results