R. v. Major, (1976) 14 N.S.R.(2d) 704 (SCC)
Judge | Laskin, C.J.C., Martland, Judson, Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz and de Grandpré, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Case Date | February 25, 1976 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1976), 14 N.S.R.(2d) 704 (SCC);[1977] 1 SCR 195;73 DLR (3d) 1;27 CCC (2d) 239;[1977] 2 SCR 256;1976 CanLII 150 (SCC);14 NSR (2d) 704;1976 CanLII 187 (SCC);1976 CanLII 1259 (SCC);1976 CanLII 173 (SCC);[1977] 2 SCR 198;[1977] 1 SCR 826;[1976] 3 WWR 664;1976 CanLII 93 (SCC);1976 CanLII 186 (SCC);[1977] 2 SCR 264 |
R. v. Major (1976), 14 N.S.R.(2d) 704 (SCC);
11 A.P.R. 704
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
....................
R. v. Major
Indexed As: R. v. Major
Supreme Court of Canada
Laskin, C.J.C., Martland, Judson, Ritchie, Spence, Pigeon, Dickson, Beetz and de Grandpré, JJ.
February 25, 1976.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Counsel:
Gordon Gale, and Terry Cooper, for the appellant;
D.A. Copp, for the respondent.
This appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada arose out of a judgment of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal dated January 9, 1975 - see 10 N.S.R.(2d) 348.
This appeal was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada on February 25, 1976. Judgment was delivered orally by the Supreme Court of Canada on February 25, 1976.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered orally by Laskin, C.J.C.
This appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada arose out of a judgment of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal dated January 9, 1975 - see 10 N.S.R.(2d) 348.
This appeal was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada on February 25, 1976. Judgment was delivered orally by the Supreme Court of Canada on February 25, 1976.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered orally by LASKIN, C.J.C.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Trang (D.) et al., 2001 ABQB 623
...2 O.R. 329; 6 C.C.C.(2d) 239 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 7, 27]. R. v. Major (1976), 10 N.S.R.(2d) 348; 25 C.C.C.(2d) 62 (C.A.), revd. [1977] 1 S.C.R. 826; 8 N.R. 210; 14 N.S.R.(2d) 704; 27 C.C.C.(2d) 239, refd to. [paras. 7, R. v. Buck et al. (1932), 57 C.C.C. 290 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [paras......
-
R. v. Khan (M.A.), 2001 SCC 86
...R. v. Brodie, [1936] S.C.R. 188, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Vallee, [1969] 3 C.C.C. 293 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Major, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 826; 8 N.R. 210, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Côté, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 8; 13 N.R. 271, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Elliott, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 393; 18......
-
R. v. Khan (M.A.), (2001) 160 Man.R.(2d) 161 (SCC)
...R. v. Brodie, [1936] S.C.R. 188, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Vallee, [1969] 3 C.C.C. 293 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Major, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 826; 8 N.R. 210, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Côté, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 8; 13 N.R. 271, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Elliott, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 393; 18......
-
Vujicic v Estate of Leona Donna MacEachern,
...the purpose of the Act ... it must still respect the actual words which express the legislative intention”); Hill v. The Queen, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 826, 850 (1976) per Pigeon, J. (“the literal construction is preferable not only because in the absence of ambiguity the literal mean......
-
R. v. Trang (D.) et al., 2001 ABQB 623
...2 O.R. 329; 6 C.C.C.(2d) 239 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 7, 27]. R. v. Major (1976), 10 N.S.R.(2d) 348; 25 C.C.C.(2d) 62 (C.A.), revd. [1977] 1 S.C.R. 826; 8 N.R. 210; 14 N.S.R.(2d) 704; 27 C.C.C.(2d) 239, refd to. [paras. 7, R. v. Buck et al. (1932), 57 C.C.C. 290 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [paras......
-
R. v. Khan (M.A.), 2001 SCC 86
...R. v. Brodie, [1936] S.C.R. 188, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Vallee, [1969] 3 C.C.C. 293 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Major, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 826; 8 N.R. 210, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Côté, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 8; 13 N.R. 271, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Elliott, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 393; 18......
-
R. v. Khan (M.A.), (2001) 160 Man.R.(2d) 161 (SCC)
...R. v. Brodie, [1936] S.C.R. 188, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Vallee, [1969] 3 C.C.C. 293 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Major, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 826; 8 N.R. 210, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Côté, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 8; 13 N.R. 271, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Elliott, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 393; 18......
-
Vujicic v Estate of Leona Donna MacEachern,
...the purpose of the Act ... it must still respect the actual words which express the legislative intention”); Hill v. The Queen, [1977] 1 S.C.R. 826, 850 (1976) per Pigeon, J. (“the literal construction is preferable not only because in the absence of ambiguity the literal mean......
-
Energy Safety and Security Act (S.C. 2015, c. 4)
...note:Delegation4.1 (1) The National Energy Board may delegate any of its powers under section 5, 5.02, 5.03, 5.11, 5.12, 26.1 or 27 to any person, and the person shall exercise those powers in accordance with the terms of the 5. The Act is amended by adding the following after section 4.1:C......