R. v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeJuriansz, Pepall and Trotter JJ.A.
Citation2017 ONCA 1013
Date21 December 2017
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC61358
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. A.C, 2018 ONCA 333
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 5, 2018
    ...it was given to the jury is some indication that from the defence’s perspective, the jury was adequately instructed: R. v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013, 143 W.C.B. (2d) 528, at para. (5) The Crown’s closing address [69] As part of the Crown’s disclosure, defence counsel was provided with a will......
  • R. v. Adamson, 2018 ONCA 678
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 3, 2018
    ...a properly instructed jury, not a perfectly instructed one: R. v. Daley, 2007 SCC 53, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 523, at para. 31; R. v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013, at para. 27. Perfection is a standard that few, if any, trial judges are capable of achieving: R. v. Jacquard, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 314, at para......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 18 – December 22, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 2, 2018
    ...Gevikoglu, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Bail, Criminal Code, s. 679(4) R v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013 [Juriansz, Pepall and Trotter Alison Craig, for the appellant Deborah Krick, for the respondent Keywords: Publication Ban, Criminal Law, Sexual As......
  • R. v. Hayes,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 25, 2022
    ...disclosure, standing alone, will never give rise to an adverse inference against the credibility of the complainant: see R. v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013, at paras. 19-21; R. v. Watson, 2019 ONSC 1899, at para. [154]       I am not prepared to accept defence ......
3 cases
  • R. v. A.C, 2018 ONCA 333
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 5, 2018
    ...it was given to the jury is some indication that from the defence’s perspective, the jury was adequately instructed: R. v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013, 143 W.C.B. (2d) 528, at para. (5) The Crown’s closing address [69] As part of the Crown’s disclosure, defence counsel was provided with a will......
  • R. v. Adamson, 2018 ONCA 678
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 3, 2018
    ...a properly instructed jury, not a perfectly instructed one: R. v. Daley, 2007 SCC 53, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 523, at para. 31; R. v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013, at para. 27. Perfection is a standard that few, if any, trial judges are capable of achieving: R. v. Jacquard, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 314, at para......
  • R. v. Hayes,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 25, 2022
    ...disclosure, standing alone, will never give rise to an adverse inference against the credibility of the complainant: see R. v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013, at paras. 19-21; R. v. Watson, 2019 ONSC 1899, at para. [154]       I am not prepared to accept defence ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 18 – December 22, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 2, 2018
    ...Gevikoglu, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Bail, Criminal Code, s. 679(4) R v. Marshall, 2017 ONCA 1013 [Juriansz, Pepall and Trotter Alison Craig, for the appellant Deborah Krick, for the respondent Keywords: Publication Ban, Criminal Law, Sexual As......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT