R. v. McCoy (D.F.), 2016 ABQB 240
Judge | Dario, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CIVIL RIGHTS,PRACTICE,EVIDENCE,COURTS,CRIMINAL LAW |
Citation | 2016 ABQB 240 |
Date | 10 May 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
R. v. Saunders,
...not been disclosed. [74] Further, I am guided by the decision of Justice Dario in R. v. McCoy, 2016 ABQB 240 (quoted with approval in R. v. Paulishyn, 2017 ABQB 61). In R. v. McCoy, supra, Justice Dario said, at paragraphs 70 and [70] I find t......
-
R. v. Fauolo (R.R.), 2016 ABPC 192
...to provide such disclosure and relies on the following authorities: R v Pilko 2000 O.J. No. 3605; R v Juneau 2015 ABPC 179 and R v McCoy 2016 ABQB 240. [112] The agent for the accused submits that there is a duty on the Crown to provide such disclosure and relies on the following authoritie......
-
R v Peterson,
...but disclosure lost through non-negligent destruction and third-party lost evidence, e.g., paras 13, 22, 45, 80, 85); R v McCoy, 2016 ABQB 240, Dario J (non-recording, as opposed to lost recording, at paras 72-74); R v Souvie, 2016 ABQB 89, Pentelechuk J, as she then was, at paras 56, 59; R......
-
R v Qasim,
...testimony was reliable. Crown agreed it has a duty to preserve evidence, but no duty to create evidence, relying on: R v McCoy, 2016 ABQB 240 at para 47. In McCoy, the officer forgot to activate the in-car video. The Court reasoned if not recording a confession was insufficient to support a......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
R. v. Saunders,
...not been disclosed. [74] Further, I am guided by the decision of Justice Dario in R. v. McCoy, 2016 ABQB 240 (quoted with approval in R. v. Paulishyn, 2017 ABQB 61). In R. v. McCoy, supra, Justice Dario said, at paragraphs 70 and [70] I find t......
-
R. v. Fauolo (R.R.), 2016 ABPC 192
...to provide such disclosure and relies on the following authorities: R v Pilko 2000 O.J. No. 3605; R v Juneau 2015 ABPC 179 and R v McCoy 2016 ABQB 240. [112] The agent for the accused submits that there is a duty on the Crown to provide such disclosure and relies on the following authoritie......
-
R v Peterson,
...but disclosure lost through non-negligent destruction and third-party lost evidence, e.g., paras 13, 22, 45, 80, 85); R v McCoy, 2016 ABQB 240, Dario J (non-recording, as opposed to lost recording, at paras 72-74); R v Souvie, 2016 ABQB 89, Pentelechuk J, as she then was, at paras 56, 59; R......
-
R v Qasim,
...testimony was reliable. Crown agreed it has a duty to preserve evidence, but no duty to create evidence, relying on: R v McCoy, 2016 ABQB 240 at para 47. In McCoy, the officer forgot to activate the in-car video. The Court reasoned if not recording a confession was insufficient to support a......
Request a trial to view additional results