R. v. McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeStrathy C.J.O., Simmons and Miller JJ.A.
Date02 September 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC63447, C63575 & C63583
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • R. v. Downey,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 6, 2022
    ...SCC 22; R. v. Murphy, 2014 NSCA 91; R. v. Phillips, 2018 ONCA 651 at para. 51; R. v. Calnen, 2019 SCC 6 at para. 165; R. v. McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548 at para. [48]         Martin J., in dissent (but not on this issue), in Calnen summarized the law as f......
  • R. v. MacKinnon,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 22, 2022
    ...No specific formula or wording is required: R. v. Hay, 2013 SCC 61, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 694, at para. 48; R. v. McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548, 393 C.C.C. (3d) 253, at para. ANALYSIS OF THE TRIAL JUDGE’S DECISION The Admissibility of Mr. Taylor’s Hearsay Statement [65]   ......
  • R v Hermkens, 2021 ABQB 1014
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 15, 2021
    ...this shit or whatever.” Since that is self-generated evidence, it may not be corroborative. See Khela at para 39; R v McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548 at para [93]        A.B., however, went on to mention that she was with Tamara, to which Mr. Hermkens repl......
  • R. v. Cook,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 17, 2020
    ...175, at para. 50; and R. v. Brown, 2018 ONCA 481, 361 C.C.C. (3d) 510, at para. 49. As Miller J.A. recently said in R. v. McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548, [2020] O.J. No. 3681, at para. 91: It is immaterial that defence counsel failed to object to the aspects of the jury charge that are at issue i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • R. v. Downey,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 6, 2022
    ...SCC 22; R. v. Murphy, 2014 NSCA 91; R. v. Phillips, 2018 ONCA 651 at para. 51; R. v. Calnen, 2019 SCC 6 at para. 165; R. v. McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548 at para. [48]         Martin J., in dissent (but not on this issue), in Calnen summarized the law as f......
  • R. v. MacKinnon,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 22, 2022
    ...No specific formula or wording is required: R. v. Hay, 2013 SCC 61, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 694, at para. 48; R. v. McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548, 393 C.C.C. (3d) 253, at para. ANALYSIS OF THE TRIAL JUDGE’S DECISION The Admissibility of Mr. Taylor’s Hearsay Statement [65]   ......
  • R v Hermkens, 2021 ABQB 1014
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 15, 2021
    ...this shit or whatever.” Since that is self-generated evidence, it may not be corroborative. See Khela at para 39; R v McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548 at para [93]        A.B., however, went on to mention that she was with Tamara, to which Mr. Hermkens repl......
  • R. v. Cook,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 17, 2020
    ...175, at para. 50; and R. v. Brown, 2018 ONCA 481, 361 C.C.C. (3d) 510, at para. 49. As Miller J.A. recently said in R. v. McFarlane, 2020 ONCA 548, [2020] O.J. No. 3681, at para. 91: It is immaterial that defence counsel failed to object to the aspects of the jury charge that are at issue i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT