R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Willcock,Fitch,Abrioux |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 298 |
| Date | 19 August 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA44275 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
R. v. Virk,
...on a s. 11(b) application is a question of law reviewable on a correctness standard: R. v. K.N., 2018 BCCA 246 at para. 13; R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298 at para. 76; R. v. Vega Ramirez, 2019 BCCA 446 at para. 26; R. v. Christhurajah, 2019 BCCA 210 at paras. 110–113; R. v. Rai, 2019 BCCA 377 ......
-
R. v. Roberts,
...rely on jurisprudence that, in my view, has been overtaken by Jordan and Cody: see, for example, K.N., Christhurajah, and R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298. [Emphasis [77] With respect to complexity, Mr. Roberts’s position is that the standard of review is correctness. He accepts that while indiv......
-
R. v. Pipping, 2020 BCCA 104
...rely on jurisprudence that, in my view, has been overtaken by Jordan and Cody: see, for example, K.N., Christhurajah, and R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298. [97] As I will describe, the characterization of the responsibility for certain discrete adjournments as legitimate or not is at issue under......
-
R. v. Rai, 2019 BCCA 377
...error: Horner at para. 70; R. v. Schertzer, 2009 ONCA 742 at para. 71, leave to appeal ref’d [2010] SCCA No. 3. See also R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298 at para. (iii) Delay Facts and Findings [98] The charges in this case were laid on 18 September 2012. The trial completed on 28 November 2017,......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
R. v. Virk,
...on a s. 11(b) application is a question of law reviewable on a correctness standard: R. v. K.N., 2018 BCCA 246 at para. 13; R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298 at para. 76; R. v. Vega Ramirez, 2019 BCCA 446 at para. 26; R. v. Christhurajah, 2019 BCCA 210 at paras. 110–113; R. v. Rai, 2019 BCCA 377 ......
-
R. v. Roberts,
...rely on jurisprudence that, in my view, has been overtaken by Jordan and Cody: see, for example, K.N., Christhurajah, and R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298. [Emphasis [77] With respect to complexity, Mr. Roberts’s position is that the standard of review is correctness. He accepts that while indiv......
-
R. v. Pipping, 2020 BCCA 104
...rely on jurisprudence that, in my view, has been overtaken by Jordan and Cody: see, for example, K.N., Christhurajah, and R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298. [97] As I will describe, the characterization of the responsibility for certain discrete adjournments as legitimate or not is at issue under......
-
R. v. Rai, 2019 BCCA 377
...error: Horner at para. 70; R. v. Schertzer, 2009 ONCA 742 at para. 71, leave to appeal ref’d [2010] SCCA No. 3. See also R. v. Millar, 2019 BCCA 298 at para. (iii) Delay Facts and Findings [98] The charges in this case were laid on 18 September 2012. The trial completed on 28 November 2017,......
Request a trial to view additional results