R. v. Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Justice R. Kwolek |
| Citation | 2020 ONCJ 356 |
| Docket Number | Sault Ste. Marie 18-2620 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Date | 28 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v SLC, 2020 ABQB 515
...of C1’s location and the location from which evidence will be given should have been included in the application (see R v Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356 at para 59). The Crown sought to justify its position by arguing that provision of such information would have frustrated the purpose of the appl......
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. BRANDON BURNS and LANDON McKAY, 2020 SKQB 228
...able to spread the virus while they are either pre-symptomatic or are asymptomatic. 3. The virus can be lethal. … [12] In R v Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356, Kwolek J. held at paragraph 70 that COVID‑19 is an exceptional circumstance that justifies the greater use of remote testimony. I agree. Thu......
-
Children’s Aid Society of Algoma v. T.P.,
...pre-conditions be met before the court would allow remote testimony in a section 714.1 application in a criminal case of R. v. Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356. The court’s observations in that case have relevance in family proceedings as [44] &#......
-
R. v. GORDON,
...upon the applicant to establish that video testimony from a witness is appropriate in the circumstances: see, for example, R v Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356 at para 43; R v Mischuk, 2021 ONCJ 202 at para 3 [Mischuk]; and R v Musseau 2019 CanLII 83451 at para 41 (Nfld Prov Ct) [Musseau]. In this a......
4 cases
-
R v SLC, 2020 ABQB 515
...of C1’s location and the location from which evidence will be given should have been included in the application (see R v Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356 at para 59). The Crown sought to justify its position by arguing that provision of such information would have frustrated the purpose of the appl......
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. BRANDON BURNS and LANDON McKAY, 2020 SKQB 228
...able to spread the virus while they are either pre-symptomatic or are asymptomatic. 3. The virus can be lethal. … [12] In R v Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356, Kwolek J. held at paragraph 70 that COVID‑19 is an exceptional circumstance that justifies the greater use of remote testimony. I agree. Thu......
-
Children’s Aid Society of Algoma v. T.P.,
...pre-conditions be met before the court would allow remote testimony in a section 714.1 application in a criminal case of R. v. Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356. The court’s observations in that case have relevance in family proceedings as [44] &#......
-
R. v. GORDON,
...upon the applicant to establish that video testimony from a witness is appropriate in the circumstances: see, for example, R v Milliken, 2020 ONCJ 356 at para 43; R v Mischuk, 2021 ONCJ 202 at para 3 [Mischuk]; and R v Musseau 2019 CanLII 83451 at para 41 (Nfld Prov Ct) [Musseau]. In this a......