R. v. MRS, 2020 ONCA 667

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePaciocco, Nordheimer and Thorburn JJ.A.
Docket NumberC67415
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date23 October 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 practice notes
  • R v Delorme, 2021 ABCA 424
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...been the same [45]        There is no dispute that cross-count evidence can be admissible: R v S(MR), 2020 ONCA 667 at paras 75-81, 396 CCC (3d) 172. The ‘real risk’ of the prejudice that can arise from ‘similar fact’ evidence a......
  • R. v. Taylor, 2021 NSSC 120
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2021
    ...used in the assessment of the credibility and reliability of that witnesses evidence on any other or all counts charged ( see R v MRS, 2020 ONCA 667 at paras.64,68-69 and R v PEC,2005 SCC 19) the trial judge’s decision leads me to conclude that she examined each count independently, ......
  • R. v. R.G.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 7, 2023
    ...of the relationship” are not “portals” to propensity evidence about uncharged similar facts (R. v. M.R.S., 2020 ONCA 667 at para. 72, citing R. v. Gareau, 2016 NSCA 75 at para. 51). However, the judge here did not simply rely on generalized......
  • R. v. Aragon,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 24, 2022
    ...The evidence is therefore prima facie inadmissible: R. v. B.(L.) (1997), 116 C.C.C. (3d) 481 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 20; R. v. M.R.S., 2020 ONCA 667, 396 C.C.C. (3d) 172, at paras. 62, 71-72; R. v. Tsigirlash, 2019 ONCA 650, at paras. 23, 25; R. v. Cook, 2020 ONCA 731, 394 C.C.C. (3d) 467, at......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • R v Delorme, 2021 ABCA 424
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...been the same [45]        There is no dispute that cross-count evidence can be admissible: R v S(MR), 2020 ONCA 667 at paras 75-81, 396 CCC (3d) 172. The ‘real risk’ of the prejudice that can arise from ‘similar fact’ evidence a......
  • R. v. Taylor, 2021 NSSC 120
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2021
    ...used in the assessment of the credibility and reliability of that witnesses evidence on any other or all counts charged ( see R v MRS, 2020 ONCA 667 at paras.64,68-69 and R v PEC,2005 SCC 19) the trial judge’s decision leads me to conclude that she examined each count independently, ......
  • R. v. R.G.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 7, 2023
    ...of the relationship” are not “portals” to propensity evidence about uncharged similar facts (R. v. M.R.S., 2020 ONCA 667 at para. 72, citing R. v. Gareau, 2016 NSCA 75 at para. 51). However, the judge here did not simply rely on generalized......
  • R. v. Aragon,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 24, 2022
    ...The evidence is therefore prima facie inadmissible: R. v. B.(L.) (1997), 116 C.C.C. (3d) 481 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 20; R. v. M.R.S., 2020 ONCA 667, 396 C.C.C. (3d) 172, at paras. 62, 71-72; R. v. Tsigirlash, 2019 ONCA 650, at paras. 23, 25; R. v. Cook, 2020 ONCA 731, 394 C.C.C. (3d) 467, at......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT