R. v. Normore, 2018 SCC 42
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | October 19, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2018 SCC 42 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...13, 125, 141, 194, 195 R v Nordyne (1998), 17 CR (5th) 393, [1998] JQ no 437 (CA) .......................... 513 R v Normore, 2018 SCC 42, [2018] 3 SCR 5 ...................................................... 545 R v Noseworthy (1997), 33 OR (3d) 641, 116 CCC (3d) 376, [1997] OJ No 1946 (CA......
-
The Trial Process
...former sex work, which were at the outer bounds of relevance if relevant at all. 320 As examples of each see, respectively, R v Normore 2018 SCC 42; R v Hillis , 2016 ONSC 451; or R v Owens , 2018 MBCA 94. 321 R v Valley (1986), 26 CCC (3d) 207 at 232 (Ont CA). CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 546 The Co......
-
R v Settle,
...enlightening. The following summaries do not delve deeply into the cases as this exercise is largely for classification; · In R v Normore, 2018 SCC 42, [2018] 3 SCR 5, the Court of Appeal had ordered a new trial for attempted murder and other offences on the basis that the trial judge shoul......
-
R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113
...very combative cross-examination, any such error did not result in a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice. The case of R v Normore, 2018 SCC 42, [2018] 3 SCR 5, is apt. It dealt with a similar situation where it was argued that the way the trial judge addressed a witness’s refusal to......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R v Settle,
...enlightening. The following summaries do not delve deeply into the cases as this exercise is largely for classification; · In R v Normore, 2018 SCC 42, [2018] 3 SCR 5, the Court of Appeal had ordered a new trial for attempted murder and other offences on the basis that the trial judge shoul......
-
R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113
...very combative cross-examination, any such error did not result in a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice. The case of R v Normore, 2018 SCC 42, [2018] 3 SCR 5, is apt. It dealt with a similar situation where it was argued that the way the trial judge addressed a witness’s refusal to......
-
EVANGELOS TSIAPLAS v. R.,
...very combative cross-examination, any such error did not result in a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice. The case of R v Normore, 2018 SCC 42, [2018] 3 SCR 5, is apt. It dealt with a similar situation where it was argued that the way the trial judge addressed a witness’s ref......
-
R. v. Normore, 2019 NLCA 12
...2018 (2018 NLCA 10). The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the Crown’s appeal and restored the convictions on October 17, 2018 (2018 SCC 42). Mr. Normore was represented by experienced legal counsel [4] Mr. N......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...13, 125, 141, 194, 195 R v Nordyne (1998), 17 CR (5th) 393, [1998] JQ no 437 (CA) .......................... 513 R v Normore, 2018 SCC 42, [2018] 3 SCR 5 ...................................................... 545 R v Noseworthy (1997), 33 OR (3d) 641, 116 CCC (3d) 376, [1997] OJ No 1946 (CA......
-
The Trial Process
...former sex work, which were at the outer bounds of relevance if relevant at all. 320 As examples of each see, respectively, R v Normore 2018 SCC 42; R v Hillis , 2016 ONSC 451; or R v Owens , 2018 MBCA 94. 321 R v Valley (1986), 26 CCC (3d) 207 at 232 (Ont CA). CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 546 The Co......