R. v. Peers, 2017 SCC 13
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm |
| Citation | 2017 SCC 13,[2017] 1 SCR 196 |
| Date | 24 February 2017 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 36865 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...v Peepeetch, 2003 SKCA 76 ............................................................................ 289 R v Peers, 2015 ABCA 407, aff’d 2017 SCC 13 ....................................................... 5 R v Penno, [1990] 2 SCR 865, 59 CCC (3d) 344, [1990] SCJ No 96 .........................
-
Introduction
...Justice Lamer did not, of course, hold that ss 8 through 14 exhausted the content of s 7. 13 R v Peers , 2015 ABCA 407 at para 7, aff’d 2017 SCC 13. FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE 6 has expressed a preference for resolving the issues under sections 8 through 14 rather than under section 7. For example......
-
Supreme Court Of Canada Denies Jury Trials For Securities Act Offences
...two recent decisions, R v Peers, 2017 SCC 13 and R v Aitkens, 2017 SCC 14, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) held that those accused of securities law offences do not have the right to a trial by The two appellants were charged with several offences under the Securities Act. The two men are......
-
No Jury Trial For Securities Offences: Economic Penalties Are Not A 'More Severe Punishment' Under Section 11(f) Of The Charter
...The Supreme Court of Canada had the opportunity to address these questions when it recently released the twin decisions of R v Peers, 2017 SCC 13 and R v Aitkens, 2017 SCC The appeals were from the decision of R v Peers, 2015 ABCA 407, in which a majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal held......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Supreme Court Of Canada Denies Jury Trials For Securities Act Offences
...two recent decisions, R v Peers, 2017 SCC 13 and R v Aitkens, 2017 SCC 14, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) held that those accused of securities law offences do not have the right to a trial by The two appellants were charged with several offences under the Securities Act. The two men are......
-
No Jury Trial For Securities Offences: Economic Penalties Are Not A 'More Severe Punishment' Under Section 11(f) Of The Charter
...The Supreme Court of Canada had the opportunity to address these questions when it recently released the twin decisions of R v Peers, 2017 SCC 13 and R v Aitkens, 2017 SCC The appeals were from the decision of R v Peers, 2015 ABCA 407, in which a majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal held......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...v Peepeetch, 2003 SKCA 76 ............................................................................ 289 R v Peers, 2015 ABCA 407, aff’d 2017 SCC 13 ....................................................... 5 R v Penno, [1990] 2 SCR 865, 59 CCC (3d) 344, [1990] SCJ No 96 .........................
-
Introduction
...Justice Lamer did not, of course, hold that ss 8 through 14 exhausted the content of s 7. 13 R v Peers , 2015 ABCA 407 at para 7, aff’d 2017 SCC 13. FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE 6 has expressed a preference for resolving the issues under sections 8 through 14 rather than under section 7. For example......