R v Pelletier, 2019 MBCA 126
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella,Madam Justice Janice L. leMaistre,Madam Justice Lori T. Spivak |
| Citation | 2019 MBCA 126 |
| Docket Number | AR19-30-09265 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Date | 19 December 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Beaulieu et al v Winnipeg (City of) et al,
...less weight to the evidence than the judge did, that is not a basis for this Court to interfere with his fact finding (see R v Pelletier, 2019 MBCA 126 at The Law [52] ......
-
R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32
...less weight to the evidence than the judge did, that is not a basis for this Court to interfere with his fact finding (see R v Pelletier, 2019 MBCA 126 at para Assessment of Credibility [20] An appellate court should show deference to a trial judge’s assessment of credibility, especially wh......
-
R. v. Henderson,
...for that time. To do otherwise 'would distort the sentencing regime'.” 48. Similarly, in R. v. Pelletier, 2019 MBCA 126 the Manitoba Court of Appeal concluded at paragraph 17: “it was not a material error, given the wording of section 719(3) of the Crimi......
3 cases
-
Beaulieu et al v Winnipeg (City of) et al,
...less weight to the evidence than the judge did, that is not a basis for this Court to interfere with his fact finding (see R v Pelletier, 2019 MBCA 126 at The Law [52] ......
-
R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32
...less weight to the evidence than the judge did, that is not a basis for this Court to interfere with his fact finding (see R v Pelletier, 2019 MBCA 126 at para Assessment of Credibility [20] An appellate court should show deference to a trial judge’s assessment of credibility, especially wh......
-
R. v. Henderson,
...for that time. To do otherwise 'would distort the sentencing regime'.” 48. Similarly, in R. v. Pelletier, 2019 MBCA 126 the Manitoba Court of Appeal concluded at paragraph 17: “it was not a material error, given the wording of section 719(3) of the Crimi......