Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

R. v. Pires; R. v. Lising, 2005 SCC 66

Judgment Cited authorities 21 Cited in 381 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise
Citation2005 SCC 66,[2005] 3 SCR 343,[2005] CarswellBC 2691,259 DLR (4th) 441,67 WCB (2d) 400,341 NR 147,JE 2005-2120,201 CCC (3d) 449,33 CR (6th) 241,EYB 2005-97678,136 CRR (2d) 85,358 WAC 65,49 BCLR (4th) 33,217 BCAC 65,[2005] ACS no 67,[2006] 4 WWR 403,[2005] SCJ No 67 (QL)
Docket Number30151, 30240
Subject MatterCIVIL RIGHTS,EVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date17 November 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
365 practice notes
  • R. v. Alcantara (J.R.) et al., (2015) 606 A.R. 313
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 13, 2015
    ...[2000] 2 S.C.R. 992; 262 N.R. 346; 143 B.C.A.C. 257; 235 W.A.C. 257; 2000 SCC 65, refd to. [para. 189]. R. v. Lising (R.) et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343; 341 N.R. 147; 217 B.C.A.C. 65; 358 W.A.C. 65; 2005 SCC 66, refd to. [para. R. v. Pires (F.B.) - see R. v. Lising (R.) et al. R. v. Garofoli ......
  • World Bank Group v. Wallace, 2016 SCC 15
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 29, 2016
    ...Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; A. (L.L.) v. B. (A.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 536; R. v. Pires, 2005 SCC 66, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343; Law Society of British Columbia v. Mangat, S.C.C., No. 27108, August 31, 2000 (Bulletin of Proceedings, September 29, 2000, p. 1542); Taypo......
  • M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2015] N.R. TBEd. DE.014
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2015
    ...realistically capable of meeting this standard, it ought not to be received. To paraphrase Charron J. in R. v. Pires , 2005 SCC 66, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343, at para. 31, there is no point in permitting the evidence if there is no reasonable likelihood that it will impact on the question of comm......
  • R. v. Raponi (W.), 2006 ABQB 593
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 23, 2006
    ...543 U.S. 146 (Sup. Ct.), affd. (2003), 333 F.3d 972 (U.S.C.A., 9th Cir.), refd to. [para. 42, footnote 24]. R. v. Lising (R.) et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343; 341 N.R. 147; 217 B.C.A.C. 65; 358 W.A.C. 65; 201 C.C.C.(3d) 449; 259 D.L.R.(4th) 441; 33 C.R.(6th) 241; [2006] 4 W.W.R. 403; 2005 Carsw......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
348 cases
  • R. v. Alcantara (J.R.) et al., (2015) 606 A.R. 313
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • August 13, 2015
    ...[2000] 2 S.C.R. 992; 262 N.R. 346; 143 B.C.A.C. 257; 235 W.A.C. 257; 2000 SCC 65, refd to. [para. 189]. R. v. Lising (R.) et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343; 341 N.R. 147; 217 B.C.A.C. 65; 358 W.A.C. 65; 2005 SCC 66, refd to. [para. R. v. Pires (F.B.) - see R. v. Lising (R.) et al. R. v. Garofoli ......
  • World Bank Group v. Wallace, 2016 SCC 15
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 29, 2016
    ...Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; A. (L.L.) v. B. (A.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 536; R. v. Pires, 2005 SCC 66, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343; Law Society of British Columbia v. Mangat, S.C.C., No. 27108, August 31, 2000 (Bulletin of Proceedings, September 29, 2000, p. 1542); Taypo......
  • M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2015] N.R. TBEd. DE.014
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2015
    ...realistically capable of meeting this standard, it ought not to be received. To paraphrase Charron J. in R. v. Pires , 2005 SCC 66, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343, at para. 31, there is no point in permitting the evidence if there is no reasonable likelihood that it will impact on the question of comm......
  • R. v. Raponi (W.), 2006 ABQB 593
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 23, 2006
    ...543 U.S. 146 (Sup. Ct.), affd. (2003), 333 F.3d 972 (U.S.C.A., 9th Cir.), refd to. [para. 42, footnote 24]. R. v. Lising (R.) et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343; 341 N.R. 147; 217 B.C.A.C. 65; 358 W.A.C. 65; 201 C.C.C.(3d) 449; 259 D.L.R.(4th) 441; 33 C.R.(6th) 241; [2006] 4 W.W.R. 403; 2005 Carsw......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
14 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Anatomy of Criminal Procedure. A Visual Guide to the Law Post-trial matters Special Post-conviction Procedures
    • June 15, 2019
    ...160 R v Pino, 2016 ONCA 389 ................................................................................... 16 R v Pires, [2005] 3 SCR 343................................................................................. 81 R v Pittiman, 2006 SCC 9..............................................
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books National Security Law. Second Edition Accountability
    • August 5, 2021
    ...666 R v Philpott, 2002 CanLII 25164 (ON SC) .........................................................664 R v Pires; R v Lising, [2005] 3 SCR 343, 341 NR 147, 2005 SCC 66.......... 665, 666 R v Plant, [1993] 1 SCR 281.................................................................................
  • Low Hanging Fruit . . . and Beyond: Canada's Drug Laws Meet the Charter
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law Society of Upper Canada Special Lectures 2017
    • June 24, 2021
    ...CA). 102 Ibid at para 45. 103 (1988), 41 CCC (3d) 1 (Ont CA). 104 R v Garofoli , [1990] 2 SCR 1421 [ Garofoli ]; R v Pires; R v Lising , [2005] 3 SCR 343. 105 Dawson v R (1998), 39 OR (3d) 436 (CA). 106 Garofoli, above note 104 at 1461. See also R v Learning , 2010 ONSC 3816; R v Blake , 20......
  • Search and Seizure
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...Collins (1989), 69 CR (3d) 235 (Ont CA). 486 R v Garofoli , [1990] 2 SCR 1421 at 1452 at 1465 [ Garofoli ]. 487 R v Pires; R v Lising , [2005] 3 SCR 343 at para 40: [T]he Garofoli leave requirement is simply a means of weeding out unnecessary proceedings on the basis that they are unlikely ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT