Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51

Judgment Cited authorities 18 Cited in 1089 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall
Citation2008 SCC 51,[2008] 3 SCR 3,297 DLR (4th) 577,[2008] 11 WWR 383,83 BCLR (4th) 44,235 CCC (3d) 290,60 CR (6th) 1,260 BCAC 40,380 NR 47,[2008] CarswellBC 2037,AZ-50514287,EYB 2008-148153,JE 2008-1861,[2008] SCJ No 52 (QL),[2008] ACS no 52,439 WAC 40,79 WCB (2d) 321
Date02 October 2008
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE,COURTS
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number32038
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1060 practice notes
  • Lameman et al. v. Alberta et al., 2013 ABCA 148
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 28, 2013
    ...al., [2011] 3 S.C.R. 708; 424 N.R. 220; 317 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 340; 986 A.P.R. 340; 2011 SCC 62, refd to. [para. 57]. R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; 380 N.R. 47; 260 B.C.A.C. 40; 439 W.A.C. 40; 2008 SCC 51, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Alberta Rules of Court - see Rules of Court (A......
  • R. v. Villaroman, [2016] 1 SCR 1000
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2016
    ...3 S.C.R. 320; R. v. Morrissey (1995), 22 O.R. (3d) 514; R. v. Laboucan, 2010 SCC 12, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 397; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. C.L.Y., 2008 SCC 2, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 5; McLean v. The King, [1933] S.C.R. 688; R. v. Mitchell, [1964] S.C.R. 471; R. v. Cooper, [1978]......
  • R. v. Tessier, 2022 SCC 35
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2022
    ...(3d) 471; R. v. Cunningham, 2017 ABCA 169, 349 C.C.C. (3d) 82; Schwartz v. Canada, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 254; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Burns, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656; R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869; Horvath v. The Queen, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 376; R. v. Love, 20......
  • Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation c. Canada (Environnement),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 28, 2011
    ...131; R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869, 211 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 50, 210 D.L.R. (4th) 608; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3, 297 D.L.R. (4th) 577, [2008] 11 W.W.R. 383; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27, (1998), 36 O.R. (3d) 418, 154 D.L.R. (4t......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1017 cases
  • Lameman et al. v. Alberta et al., 2013 ABCA 148
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 28, 2013
    ...al., [2011] 3 S.C.R. 708; 424 N.R. 220; 317 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 340; 986 A.P.R. 340; 2011 SCC 62, refd to. [para. 57]. R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; 380 N.R. 47; 260 B.C.A.C. 40; 439 W.A.C. 40; 2008 SCC 51, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Alberta Rules of Court - see Rules of Court (A......
  • R. v. Villaroman, [2016] 1 SCR 1000
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2016
    ...3 S.C.R. 320; R. v. Morrissey (1995), 22 O.R. (3d) 514; R. v. Laboucan, 2010 SCC 12, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 397; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. C.L.Y., 2008 SCC 2, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 5; McLean v. The King, [1933] S.C.R. 688; R. v. Mitchell, [1964] S.C.R. 471; R. v. Cooper, [1978]......
  • R. v. Tessier, 2022 SCC 35
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2022
    ...(3d) 471; R. v. Cunningham, 2017 ABCA 169, 349 C.C.C. (3d) 82; Schwartz v. Canada, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 254; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Burns, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656; R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869; Horvath v. The Queen, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 376; R. v. Love, 20......
  • R. v. Holloway (P.S.), 2014 ABCA 87
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 6, 2014
    ...R. v. Teskey (L.M.), [2007] 2 S.C.R. 267; 364 N.R. 164; 412 A.R. 361; 404 W.A.C. 361; 2007 SCC 25, refd to. [para. 38]. R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; 380 N.R. 47; 260 B.C.A.C. 40; 439 W.A.C. 40; 2008 SCC 51, refd to. [para. R. v. Crazyboy (S.E.) (2012), 533 A.R. 371; 557 W.A.C. 371; 288 ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 17 – 21, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 24, 2018
    ...Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Evidence, Post-Occurrence Demeanour, Sufficiency of Reasons, R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3, R v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, R. v. H.S.B., 3 S.C.R. 32, R. v. Dobson, 2009 ONCA 714, R. v. Mah, 2002 NSCA 99 href="http://www.ontariocourts.......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 5 - 9, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 21, 2019
    ...Video Evidence, Third Party Records, Sentencing, R. v. L. (D.O.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419, R. v. Edgar, 2010 ONCA 0529, R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3, R. v. W.(D), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742, R. v. L.L., 2009 ONCA 0413, R. v. Radcliffe, 2017 ONCA 176, leave to appeal refused, [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 274......
  • Cojocaru (Guardian Ad Litem) v British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Center
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 26, 2011
    ...in nature, addressed uncontroversial facts, or simply summarized the plaintiffs' submissions. The court referred to the case of R v RM, [2008] 3 SCR 3, where the Supreme Court of Canada explained the purpose behind reasons for judgment: (1) reasons provide public accountability; (2) reasons......
37 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...397, 404, 405, 408, 643 R v REM, 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 SCR 3.....................................................................................................................583 R v S(RD), [1997] 3 SCR 484, [1997] SCJ No 84.......................................................................
  • Evidence; Procedure; Costs
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • July 27, 2022
    ...v Welsh, [1998] OJ No 4550 (Gen Div). Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109. Mitro v Mitro (1978), 1 RFL (2d) 382 (Ont CA). 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 SCR 3 at para 49; see also GRR v JES, 2020 NBQB RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28 at para 31. RSO 1990, c C12. TDL v LRL (1994), 4 RFL (4th) 103 (Ont Ct Gen D......
  • Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...103 R v JJRD , [2006] OJ No 4749 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2007] SCCA No 69; R v CF , 2010 ONCA 424 at para 9; R v M(RE) , [2008] 3 SCR 3 at para 66. Ordinarily, a jury should not be directed that it may convict without identifying serious flaws in exculpatory defence evidence ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...R v M(R) (1998), 113 OAC 40 ...............................................................................98 R v M(RE), [2008] 3 SCR 3 ...........................................................................26, 688 R v M(S), 2013 ONCJ 415.......................................................
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT