R. v. R.E.M.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall |
| Docket Number | 32038 |
| Date | 02 October 2008 |
| Citation | 2008 SCC 51,[2008] 3 SCR 3,297 DLR (4th) 577,[2008] 11 WWR 383,83 BCLR (4th) 44,235 CCC (3d) 290,60 CR (6th) 1,260 BCAC 40,380 NR 47,[2008] CarswellBC 2037,AZ-50514287,EYB 2008-148153,JE 2008-1861,[2008] SCJ No 52 (QL),[2008] ACS no 52,439 WAC 40,79 WCB (2d) 321 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1169 practice notes
-
R v Kinamore,
...SCC 19; R. v. Morris, 2024 ONSC 4155, 97 C.R. (7th) 35; R. v. T.A.H., 2019 BCSC 1614, 58 C.R. (7th) 148; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Morrison, 2019 SCC 15, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. L.S., 2017 ONCA 685, 354 C.C.C. (3d) 71;......
-
R v T.J.F.,
...2024 SCC 25; R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 801; R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Gerrard, 2022 SCC 13; R. v. Kruk, 2024 SCC 7; R. v. George, 2017 SCC 38, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 1021; R. v. Morrissey (1995), 97 C.C.C. (......
-
R. v. Villaroman,
...3 S.C.R. 320; R. v. Morrissey (1995), 22 O.R. (3d) 514; R. v. Laboucan, 2010 SCC 12, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 397; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. C.L.Y., 2008 SCC 2, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 5; McLean v. The King, [1933] S.C.R. 688; R. v. Mitchell, [1964] S.C.R. 471; R. v. Cooper, [1978]......
-
R. v. MacKenzie,
...R. 1; R. v. Schrenk, 2010 MBCA 38, 255 Man. R. (2d) 12; R. v. Aucoin, 2012 SCC 66, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 408; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Turpin, 2010 SKQB 444, 365 Sask. R. 67, aff’d 2012 SKCA 50, 393 Sask. R. 184; Hunter v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145; R. v. Collin......
Get Started for Free
1132 cases
-
R. v. Chouhan
...1128; R. v. Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 621; F.H. v. McDougall, 2008 SCC 53, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 41; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688; R. v. Golden, 2001 SCC 83, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 679; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14; R. v. Myers, 2019 SCC 18, [2019......
-
R. v. Rioux, 2025 SCC 34
...345; R. v. Sutton, 2000 SCC 50, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 595; R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Burns, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656; R. v. Greenwood, 2022 NSCA 53, 415 C.C.C. (3d) 89; R. v. White, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72; R. v. Robinson, 2017 ONC......
-
Eli Lilly & Co. et al. v. Apotex Inc., (2009) 351 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
...the meaning of this phrase as used in a patent claim respecting cefaclor - See paragraphs 125 to 141. Cases Noticed: R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; 380 N.R. 47; 260 B.C.A.C. 40; 439 W.A.C. 40; 235 C.C.C.(3d) 290; 2008 SCC 51, refd to. [para. 8, footnote 5]. Synthon BV v. Smithkline Beecha......
-
R. v. Henderson (W.E.)
...26, refd to. [para. 61]. R. v. Rocha (S.) (2009), 236 Man.R.(2d) 213; 448 W.A.C. 213; 2009 MBCA 26, refd to. [para. 61]. R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; 380 N.R. 47; 260 B.C.A.C. 40; 439 W.A.C. 40; 2008 SCC 51, refd to. [para. 62]. R. v. Godoy (V.), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; 235 N.R. 134; 117 O......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 17 21, 2018)
...Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Evidence, Post-Occurrence Demeanour, Sufficiency of Reasons, R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3, R v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, R. v. H.S.B., 3 S.C.R. 32, R. v. Dobson, 2009 ONCA 714, R. v. Mah, 2002 NSCA 99 href="http://www.ontariocourts.......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 5 - 9, 2019)
...Video Evidence, Third Party Records, Sentencing, R. v. L. (D.O.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419, R. v. Edgar, 2010 ONCA 0529, R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3, R. v. W.(D), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742, R. v. L.L., 2009 ONCA 0413, R. v. Radcliffe, 2017 ONCA 176, leave to appeal refused, [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 274......
-
Cojocaru (Guardian Ad Litem) v British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Center
...in nature, addressed uncontroversial facts, or simply summarized the plaintiffs' submissions. The court referred to the case of R v RM, [2008] 3 SCR 3, where the Supreme Court of Canada explained the purpose behind reasons for judgment: (1) reasons provide public accountability; (2) reasons......
43 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...410, 418, 422, 661 R v REM, 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 SCR 3.........................................................................................................599 R v S(RD), [1997] 3 SCR 484, [1997] SCJ No 84........................................................................................
-
Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
...103 R v JJRD , [2006] OJ No 4749 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2007] SCCA No 69; R v CF , 2010 ONCA 424 at para 9; R v M(RE) , [2008] 3 SCR 3 at para 66. Ordinarily, a jury should not be directed that it may convict without identifying serious flaws in exculpatory defence evidence ......
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...[1998] OJ No 4550 (Gen Div). 11 Jacobucci v Jacobucci, 2006 MBCA 109. 12 Mitro v Mitro (1978), 1 RFL (2d) 382 (Ont CA). 13 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 SCR 3 at para 49; see also GRR v JES, 2020 NBQB 14 RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28 at para 31. 15 B-M (Children: Findings of Fact), [2021] EWCA Civ 1371 at ......
-
Table of cases
...R v M(R) (1998), 113 OAC 40 ...............................................................................98 R v M(RE), [2008] 3 SCR 3 ...........................................................................26, 688 R v M(S), 2013 ONCJ 415.......................................................
Get Started for Free