R. v. Villaroman
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell |
| Citation | [2016] 1 SCR 1000,2016 SCC 33,338 CCC (3d) 1,[2016] SCJ No 33 (QL),401 DLR (4th) 385 |
| Docket Number | 36435 |
| Date | 29 July 2016 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,EVIDENCE,NARCOTIC CONTROL |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
743 practice notes
-
Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville
...SKCA 17, 372 C.C.C. (3d) 442; R. v. M.N., 2017 ONCA 434, 37 C.R. (7th) 418; Joly v. R., 2024 QCCA 1151; R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Choudhury, 2021 ONCA 560; R. v. Chalk, 2007 ONCA 815, 88 O.R. (3d) 448; R. v. Midwinter, 2015 ONCA 150; R. v. Bissonnette, 2022 ......
-
R. v. Sheppard
...Police Services Board, 2007 SCC 41, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 129; R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 788; R. v. Chung, 2020 SCC 8, [2020] 1 S.C.R. 405; R. v. Kruk, 2024 SCC 7; R. v. A.G., 2000......
-
R v. Qiyuk et al.
...might still perhaps be circumstantial evidence as to how that person got there that would meet the test in R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 SCR 1000, in proving that he earlier operated on or in a prohibited area. So, as counsel for the appellants argues, they could face prosecution ev......
-
R. v. Kruk
...146 ; R. v. S. (W.D.), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 521 ; R. v. Avetysan, 2000 SCC 56 , [2000] 2 S.C.R. 745 ; R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 , [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Esquivel‑Benitez, 2020 ONCA 160 , 61 C.R. (7th) 326 ; Wild v. The Queen, [1971] S.C.R. 101; Rousseau v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 8 12, 2019)
...Labelle, 2016 ONCA 110; R. v. O.N., 2017 ONCA 923; R. v. Howe (2005), 192 C.C.C. (3d) 480 (Ont. C.A.); R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 v. Bhagwandat , 2019 ONCA 589 Keywords: Appeal Book Endorsement, Mental Disorder, Unequivocal Plea v. Dean, 2......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 4-September 8)
...Martin, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Drug Trafficking, Evidence, Circumstantial Evidence, R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000, Sentencing, Proportionality, R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors CIVIL ENDORSEMENTS S......
14 books & journal articles
-
Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
...evidence permits only one reasonable inference: guilt. 80 79 White , above note 24 at paras 29 and 97. 80 R v Villaroman , [2016] 1 SCR 1000; R v Griffin , [2009] 2 SCR 42. The “rule in Hodge’s Case ” once required that juries receive a special instruction about how to apply the reasonable ......
-
Table of cases
...R v Vickers, 2010 ONSC 5180 ............................................................................ 212 R v Villaroman, [2016] 1 SCR 1000................................................36, 38, 683, 684 R v Villeda, 2011 ABCA 85 ................................................................
-
Table of cases
...559 R v Villaroman, 2012 ABQB 630, 557 AR 1........................................................ 225 R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 SCR 1000 ............................................. 575 R v Villaroman, 2018 ABCA 220, 363 CCC (3d) 141 ................................... 88, 22......
-
The Basics of Admissibility and the Evaluation of Evidence
...doubt. 13 See R v Jackson , 2015 ONCA 832 at paras 119–123; R v Ansari , 2015 ONCA 575 at para 102 [ Ansari ]. 14 R v Villaroman , [2016] 1 SCR 1000 at para 23 [ Villaroman ]. 15 R v Cinous , [2002] 2 SCR 3 at para 88. 16 Ibid at para 89. 17 Villaroman , above note 14 at para 23. The Basics......
Get Started for Free
