R. v. Villaroman, [2016] 1 SCR 1000

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell
Citation[2016] 1 SCR 1000,2016 SCC 33,338 CCC (3d) 1,[2016] SCJ No 33 (QL),401 DLR (4th) 385
Date29 July 2016
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,EVIDENCE,NARCOTIC CONTROL
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number36435
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
524 practice notes
  • R v Harrison,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 12, 2023
    ...to show when or how the card came to be there”). 49 The Queen v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, ¶¶ 18, 22 & 26-31; [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000, 1011 & 1014-17 (“It is now settled that no particular form of instruction to the jury is required where the evidence on one or m......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 8 – 12, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 23, 2019
    ...Labelle, 2016 ONCA 110; R. v. O.N., 2017 ONCA 923; R. v. Howe (2005), 192 C.C.C. (3d) 480 (Ont. C.A.); R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 v. Bhagwandat , 2019 ONCA 589 Keywords: Appeal Book Endorsement, Mental Disorder, Unequivocal Plea v. Dean, 2......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...559 R v Villaroman, 2012 ABQB 630, 557 AR 1........................................................ 225 R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 SCR 1000 ............................................. 575 R v Villaroman, 2018 ABCA 220, 363 CCC (3d) 141 ................................... 88, 22......
  • Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...evidence permits only one reasonable inference: guilt. 80 79 White , above note 24 at paras 29 and 97. 80 R v Villaroman , [2016] 1 SCR 1000; R v Griffin , [2009] 2 SCR 42. The “rule in Hodge’s Case ” once required that juries receive a special instruction about how to apply the reasonable ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
507 cases
  • R v Harrison,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 12, 2023
    ...to show when or how the card came to be there”). 49 The Queen v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, ¶¶ 18, 22 & 26-31; [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000, 1011 & 1014-17 (“It is now settled that no particular form of instruction to the jury is required where the evidence on one or m......
  • R. v. Barrett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 3, 2020
    ...that the accused’s guilt is the only reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence as a whole: R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000, at para. 20. [37] To determine if the circumstantial evidence meets the required standard of proof, the trier of fact must keep in mind th......
  • R v Sandoval-Barillas, 2017 ABCA 154
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 24, 2017
    ...the right thing.[39] As to the circumstantial evidence in this case, it is timely to here note R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 at para 71, [2016] 1 SCR 1000. In reversing this Court and restoring a conviction, relying on the reasons of this Court in R v Dipnarine, 2014 ABCA 328 at paras 22 and ......
  • R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 31, 2020
    ...no memory until she awoke to find his penis in her vagina. Mr. Mehari points to the principles set out in R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 SCR 1000, and argues that the trial judge erred “by failing to consider other plausible reasons why A.K. would not have remembered the period from ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 8 – 12, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 23, 2019
    ...Labelle, 2016 ONCA 110; R. v. O.N., 2017 ONCA 923; R. v. Howe (2005), 192 C.C.C. (3d) 480 (Ont. C.A.); R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 v. Bhagwandat , 2019 ONCA 589 Keywords: Appeal Book Endorsement, Mental Disorder, Unequivocal Plea v. Dean, 2......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 4-September 8)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 19, 2017
    ...Martin, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Drug Trafficking, Evidence, Circumstantial Evidence, R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000, Sentencing, Proportionality, R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors CIVIL ENDORSEMENTS S......
13 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...559 R v Villaroman, 2012 ABQB 630, 557 AR 1........................................................ 225 R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 SCR 1000 ............................................. 575 R v Villaroman, 2018 ABCA 220, 363 CCC (3d) 141 ................................... 88, 22......
  • Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...evidence permits only one reasonable inference: guilt. 80 79 White , above note 24 at paras 29 and 97. 80 R v Villaroman , [2016] 1 SCR 1000; R v Griffin , [2009] 2 SCR 42. The “rule in Hodge’s Case ” once required that juries receive a special instruction about how to apply the reasonable ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...R v Vickers, 2010 ONSC 5180 ............................................................................ 212 R v Villaroman, [2016] 1 SCR 1000................................................36, 38, 683, 684 R v Villeda, 2011 ABCA 85 ................................................................
  • The Basics of Admissibility and the Evaluation of Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...doubt. 13 See R v Jackson , 2015 ONCA 832 at paras 119–123; R v Ansari , 2015 ONCA 575 at para 102 [ Ansari ]. 14 R v Villaroman , [2016] 1 SCR 1000 at para 23 [ Villaroman ]. 15 R v Cinous , [2002] 2 SCR 3 at para 88. 16 Ibid at para 89. 17 Villaroman , above note 14 at para 23. The Basics......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT