R. v. R.W., 2015 Q.B.C. No. 18

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeSchwann, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Citation2015 Q.B.C. No. 18,2016 SKQB 11
Date08 January 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Assiniboine (D.L.), 2016 SKQB 149
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 29 Abril 2016
    ...Agecoutay , 2009 SKCA 100, 247 CCC (3d) 75; R v Gillis , 2009 ONCA 312, 248 OAC 1; R v Drouin (1994), 125 Sask R 49 (CA); and R v Wolfe , 2016 SKQB 11. [143] I agree with the joint submission of counsel regarding remand credit, that same should be calculated at a 1.5 multiple of time spent ......
  • R v Parchomchuk,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...v Vaquerano,2000 SKCA (SentDig) 44,hammer“skull fracture”; 8 days in hospitalspousal abuse; mentally ill accused24 monthsR v Wolfe,2016 SKQB 11baseball bat“serious medical difficulties”2 victims; plus 3.5 years for sexual assault; reduced for totality to 5 in total24 monthsR v LaChance,2009......
  • R. v. MEYERS,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 5 Enero 2017
    ...of the assault speak for themselves. In light of all of these considerations, the proper sentence is 22 months in jail. [25] In R v Wolfe, 2016 SKQB 11 [Wolfe], the 39 year old offender attempted sexual intercourse with the complainant while she slept. After she awoke, and objected, he trie......
3 cases
  • R. v. Assiniboine (D.L.), 2016 SKQB 149
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 29 Abril 2016
    ...Agecoutay , 2009 SKCA 100, 247 CCC (3d) 75; R v Gillis , 2009 ONCA 312, 248 OAC 1; R v Drouin (1994), 125 Sask R 49 (CA); and R v Wolfe , 2016 SKQB 11. [143] I agree with the joint submission of counsel regarding remand credit, that same should be calculated at a 1.5 multiple of time spent ......
  • R v Parchomchuk,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...v Vaquerano,2000 SKCA (SentDig) 44,hammer“skull fracture”; 8 days in hospitalspousal abuse; mentally ill accused24 monthsR v Wolfe,2016 SKQB 11baseball bat“serious medical difficulties”2 victims; plus 3.5 years for sexual assault; reduced for totality to 5 in total24 monthsR v LaChance,2009......
  • R. v. MEYERS,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 5 Enero 2017
    ...of the assault speak for themselves. In light of all of these considerations, the proper sentence is 22 months in jail. [25] In R v Wolfe, 2016 SKQB 11 [Wolfe], the 39 year old offender attempted sexual intercourse with the complainant while she slept. After she awoke, and objected, he trie......