R. v. Racca (R.A.), (2015) 323 Man.R.(2d) 245 (CA)

JudgeMonnin, Steel and Burnett, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Case DateJune 19, 2015
JurisdictionManitoba
Citations(2015), 323 Man.R.(2d) 245 (CA);2015 MBCA 121

R. v. Racca (R.A.) (2015), 323 Man.R.(2d) 245 (CA);

      657 W.A.C. 245

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2016] Man.R.(2d) TBEd. JA.003

Her Majesty The Queen (appellant) v. Reynaldo Ascalona Racca (accused/respondent)

(AR 14-30-08280; 2015 MBCA 121)

Indexed As: R. v. Racca (R.A.)

Manitoba Court of Appeal

Monnin, Steel and Burnett, JJ.A.

December 17, 2015.

Summary:

The accused was convicted of possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking. He was sentenced to a conditional sentence of two years less a day. The Crown applied for leave to appeal and appealed the sentence.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal and allowed the appeal. The accused was sentenced to 36 months' imprisonment with credit for time served conditionally.

Criminal Law - Topic 5720.4

Punishments (sentence) - Conditional sentence - When available or appropriate - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5850 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 5830.4

Sentencing - Considerations on imposing sentence - Guilty plea - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5850 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 5830.8

Sentencing - Considerations on imposing sentence - Drug and narcotic offences - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5850 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 5832

Sentencing - Considerations on imposing sentence - Rehabilitation - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5850 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 5850

Sentence - Trafficking in a narcotic or a controlled drug or substance (incl. possession for the purpose of trafficking) - In October 2010, Racca was arrested in his vehicle - He had one ounce of cocaine and $480 in cash in his possession - 30 individually wrapped ounces of cocaine, $160 in cash and a digital scale were seized from his residence - In April 2014, Racca pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking - In October 2014, the sentencing judge imposed a conditional sentence of two years less a day - He found that the length of time between Racca's arrest and sentence made the case an exception to the established sentencing range given that, inter alia, Racca was "effectively rehabilitated" - The Manitoba Court of Appeal allowed the Crown's sentence appeal - The sentencing judge placed undue emphasis on the passage of time and overemphasized rehabilitation at the expense of deterrence and denunciation - While a guilty plea was always a mitigating factor, it should have little impact on sentence when entered four years after being charged in the face of an overwhelming case - There was no evidence of rehabilitation - Complying with conditions and obeying the law while on judicial interim release did not constitute rehabilitation; it was the standard expected of persons released on their own recognizance - Racca was a mid-level commercial trafficker who not only delivered drugs but stashed them in his residence - A conditional sentence was clearly inadequate - Racca was sentenced to 36 months' imprisonment with credit for time served conditionally.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Grant (I.M.) (2009), 236 Man.R.(2d) 54; 448 W.A.C. 54; 2009 MBCA 9, refd to. [para. 3].

R. v. Voong (D.M.) et al. (2015), 374 B.C.A.C. 166; 642 W.A.C. 166; 2015 BCCA 285, refd to. [para. 3].

R. v. Oates (K.A.L.) (2015), 373 B.C.A.C. 123; 641 W.A.C. 123; 2015 BCCA 259, refd to. [para. 4].

R. v. Rocha (S.) (2009), 236 Man.R.(2d) 213; 448 W.A.C. 213; 2009 MBCA 26, refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. Tran (A.) (2015), 323 Man.R.(2d) 293; 657 W.A.C. 293; 2015 MBCA 120, dist. [para. 11].

R. v. Peters (R.N.) (2015), 323 Man.R.(2d) 237; 657 W.A.C. 237; 2015 MBCA 119, dist. [para. 11].

R. v. Barrett, 2013 QCCA 1351, refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Traimany (P.) (2011), 270 Man.R.(2d) 291; 524 W.A.C. 291; 2011 MBCA 104, refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Brown (T.C.) (2012), 280 Man.R.(2d) 205; 548 W.A.C. 205; 2012 MBCA 60, refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Ducharme (W.W.), [2012] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 20; 2012 MBCA 35, refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Sem (S.) (2005), 197 Man.R.(2d) 47; 2005 MBQB 208, refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Toorie (G.S.) (2012), 279 Man.R.(2d) 29; 2012 MBQB 135, refd to. [para. 20].

R. v. MacDonald (K.) (2009), 236 Man.R.(2d) 239; 448 W.A.C. 239; 2009 MBCA 36, refd to. [para. 21].

Counsel:

R.H. Smith and J.S. Kliewer, for the appellant;

J.C. Prober, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard on June 19, 2015, before Monnin, Steel and Burnett, JJ.A., of the Manitoba Court of Appeal. Burnett, J.A., delivered the following judgment for the court on December 17, 2015.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 practice notes
  • R v Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 21, 2017
    ...that this was a case of “exceptional circumstances” (R v Peters, 2015 MBCA 119; R v Tran (A), 2015 MBCA 120 at para 2; and R v Racca, 2015 MBCA 121). Second, if the sentence imposed was unfit, would it serve the ends of justice to re-incarcerate the accused now given that he has already suc......
  • R v McLean,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...had some “decision-making” authority or responsibility (Rocha at para 61; R v Ducharme, 2012 MBCA 35 at para 3; R v Racca, 2015 MBCA 121 at para 18; R v Delacruz, 2017 MBCA 10 at para 5; R v Slotta, 2020 MBCA 79 at para 30; and R v Lewyc-Sullivan, 2021 MBCA 92 at para 12)......
  • R v Le, 2018 MBCA 58
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • May 8, 2018
    ...to custody because of exceptional circumstances (see R v Peters, 2015 MBCA 119; R v Tran (A), 2015 MBCA 120 at para 2; R v Racca, 2015 MBCA 121; and R v Sass; R v Zammit, 2018 MBCA [4] We disagree. When the judge’s reasons are read in their entirety, it is evident that he carefully weighed ......
  • R v Petrowski, 2020 MBCA 78
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • August 27, 2020
    ...and deter not only the offender, but any others who may be similarly inclined. See also R v Johnson, 2020 MBCA 10 at para 12; R v Racca, 2015 MBCA 121 at para 13; and R v Grant (IM), 2009 MBCA 9 at paras [40] In R v Stone, [1999] 2 SCR 290, Bastarache J, writing for a majority Supreme Court......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • R v Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 21, 2017
    ...that this was a case of “exceptional circumstances” (R v Peters, 2015 MBCA 119; R v Tran (A), 2015 MBCA 120 at para 2; and R v Racca, 2015 MBCA 121). Second, if the sentence imposed was unfit, would it serve the ends of justice to re-incarcerate the accused now given that he has already suc......
  • R v McLean,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...had some “decision-making” authority or responsibility (Rocha at para 61; R v Ducharme, 2012 MBCA 35 at para 3; R v Racca, 2015 MBCA 121 at para 18; R v Delacruz, 2017 MBCA 10 at para 5; R v Slotta, 2020 MBCA 79 at para 30; and R v Lewyc-Sullivan, 2021 MBCA 92 at para 12)......
  • R v Petrowski, 2020 MBCA 78
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • August 27, 2020
    ...and deter not only the offender, but any others who may be similarly inclined. See also R v Johnson, 2020 MBCA 10 at para 12; R v Racca, 2015 MBCA 121 at para 13; and R v Grant (IM), 2009 MBCA 9 at paras [40] In R v Stone, [1999] 2 SCR 290, Bastarache J, writing for a majority Supreme Court......
  • R v Le, 2018 MBCA 58
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • May 8, 2018
    ...to custody because of exceptional circumstances (see R v Peters, 2015 MBCA 119; R v Tran (A), 2015 MBCA 120 at para 2; R v Racca, 2015 MBCA 121; and R v Sass; R v Zammit, 2018 MBCA [4] We disagree. When the judge’s reasons are read in their entirety, it is evident that he carefully weighed ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT