R. v. Riley, 2017 ONCA 650

JudgeLaForme; Watt; Trotter
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Case DateFriday August 11, 2017
JurisdictionOntario
Citations2017 ONCA 650
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
32 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 23-27)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 11, 2019
    ...ONCA 639, R. v. Husbands, 2017 ONCA 607, leave to appeal refused, [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 364, R. v. Esseghaier, 2019 ONCA 672, R. v. Riley, 2017 ONCA 650, leave to appeal refused, [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 216, R. v. Murray, 2017 ONCA 393, R. v. Noureddine, 2015 ONCA 770, R. v. Swite, 2011 BCCA 54, ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Search and Seizure
    • May 3, 2021
    ...3 SCR 525, 1996 CanLII 185 .................................................. 297 Riley , R v , 2008 CanLII 36773 (Ont Sup Ct J), af ’d 2017 ONCA 650, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2020 CanLII 22058, [2019] SCCA No 412 (QL) ............................................... 511 Riley , R v ,......
  • Exclusion of Evidence
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ..., supra note 12; United States v Ceccolini , 435 US 268 (1978), Rehnquist J, on whose analysis the Court relied; see also R v Riley , 2017 ONCA 650 at paras 315-17. © 2023 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 2 Exclusion of Evidence 35 analysis will make it extremely ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ...(Prov Ct) .............................. 107 Ricketts, R v, 2014 ONSC 3210 .............................................. 228 Riley, R v, 2017 ONCA 650 ................................................... 34 Rizzuto, R c, 2021 QCCA 1789 ............................................... 227 RJR......
  • Get Started for Free
22 cases
  • R v Delorme, 2021 ABCA 424
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...R v Labossière, 2014 MBCA 89 at paras 22-25, 317 CCC (3d) 219; R v O(R), 2015 ONCA 814 at paras 15-16, 333 CCC (3d) 367; R v Riley, 2017 ONCA 650 at paras 156-157, 351 CCC (3d) 223, leave denied [2018] SCCA No 216, [2019] SCCA No 412 (QL); R v Giesbrecht, 2019 MBCA 35 at paras 73-......
  • R v Mela, 2021 ABCA 38
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 3, 2021
    ...R v McGown, 2016 ONCA 575 at paras 47-48, 93, 341 CCC (3d) 53; R v Spence, 2018 ONCA 427 at paras 31-32, 360 CCC (3d) 425; R v Riley,2017 ONCA 650, 351 CCC (3d) 223, leave denied (2020) [2019] SCCA No 412 (QL) (SCC No 38918); R v Gallant, 2019 BCCA 193 at paras 31-33, 378 CCC (3d) 361, leav......
  • R. v. Lambert,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 6, 2020
    ...it is said to have flowed must be examined. 46 [40] This same principle was recently noted by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. Riley, 2017 ONCA 650. There, at para. 316, the Court noted that when considering alleged derivative evidence under s. 24(2), a trial judge is required to "[exam......
  • R. v. Evans,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 11, 2019
    ...recent decisions of this court, the trial judge’s decision in Riley (S.C.) was acknowledged as incorrect by this court in R. v. Riley, 2017 ONCA 650, 351 C.C.C. (3d) 223, at para. 75 (Riley (C.A.)”), leave to appeal refused, [2018] S.C.C.A. No. [3] This procedure will change on September 19......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 23-27)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 11, 2019
    ...ONCA 639, R. v. Husbands, 2017 ONCA 607, leave to appeal refused, [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 364, R. v. Esseghaier, 2019 ONCA 672, R. v. Riley, 2017 ONCA 650, leave to appeal refused, [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 216, R. v. Murray, 2017 ONCA 393, R. v. Noureddine, 2015 ONCA 770, R. v. Swite, 2011 BCCA 54, ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 29 – August 2, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 8, 2019
    ...393, 347 C.C.C. (3d) 529, R. v. Husbands, 2017 ONCA 607, 353 C.C.C. (3d) 317, leave to appeal refused, [2017] SCCA No. 364; R. v. Riley, 2017 ONCA 650, 351 C.C.C. (3d) 223, leave to appeal refused, [2018] SCCA No. 216, R. v. Gayle (2001), 154 C.C.C. (3d) 221 (Ont. C.A.), leave to appeal to ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 7 – 11, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 21, 2017
    ...SCC 27, R v. Cody, 2017 SCC 31, R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771, R. v. Coulter, 2016 ONCA 704, R v. Gordon, 2017 ONCA 436 R. v. Riley, 2017 ONCA 650 [LaForme, Watt and Trotter J. Wilkinson and M. Salama, for the appellant, Phillip Atkins J. Lockyer and A. Ostroff, for the appellant, Jason ......
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Search and Seizure
    • May 3, 2021
    ...3 SCR 525, 1996 CanLII 185 .................................................. 297 Riley , R v , 2008 CanLII 36773 (Ont Sup Ct J), af ’d 2017 ONCA 650, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2020 CanLII 22058, [2019] SCCA No 412 (QL) ............................................... 511 Riley , R v ,......
  • Exclusion of Evidence
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ..., supra note 12; United States v Ceccolini , 435 US 268 (1978), Rehnquist J, on whose analysis the Court relied; see also R v Riley , 2017 ONCA 650 at paras 315-17. © 2023 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 2 Exclusion of Evidence 35 analysis will make it extremely ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ...(Prov Ct) .............................. 107 Ricketts, R v, 2014 ONSC 3210 .............................................. 228 Riley, R v, 2017 ONCA 650 ................................................... 34 Rizzuto, R c, 2021 QCCA 1789 ............................................... 227 RJR......
  • Preliminary Matters and Remedies
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...event, those jurors are re-called in 240 Barrow , above note 25. 241 Sherratt , above note 210 at 534. 242 See, for example, R v Riley , 2017 ONCA 650, which considered the extent to which a judge could “vet” potential jurors given the interplay between the power to excuse (given to the jud......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT