R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Costigan,The Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter
Citation2020 ABCA 388
Docket Number1903-0171-A
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date03 November 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • R v Profeit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Noviembre 2021
    ...that he did not attempt to use it in support of a mistrial motion. [83]        In R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388, 394 CCC (3d) 516 there was a mistrial application by replacement counsel after trial and before sentencing. Accordingly, this Court in Sauverwa......
  • R v Lavallee, 2020 ABCA 464
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 Diciembre 2020
    ...examination of the Mistrial Reasons, the foundational unfairness of what happened is revealed. [43] But as pointed out in R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388 at para 11, [2020] AJ No 1170 (QL): “... The existence of a fully aired out mistrial motion can be of considerable significance in determin......
  • R v Sidhu,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 10 Febrero 2021
    ...92 Alta LR (6th) 27; R v Hobbs, 2020 ABCA 156, para 31; R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281, paras 64-66, 11 Alta LR (7th) 309; R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388, para [34] An appellant who challenges the reliability of a verdict must show there is a real or reasonable probability that the trial outco......
  • R v Lundle,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 12 Enero 2023
    ...standard, with reference to the circumstances of this case at the time of trial and without benefit of hindsight: R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388, paras 15-18, 394 CCC (3d) 516; R v GDB, 2000 SCC 22, paras 26-29, [2000] 1 SCR 520; R v White, 2022 SCC 7, para 6, 411 CCC (3d) 419.  V. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • R v Profeit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Noviembre 2021
    ...that he did not attempt to use it in support of a mistrial motion. [83]        In R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388, 394 CCC (3d) 516 there was a mistrial application by replacement counsel after trial and before sentencing. Accordingly, this Court in Sauverwa......
  • R v Lavallee, 2020 ABCA 464
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 Diciembre 2020
    ...examination of the Mistrial Reasons, the foundational unfairness of what happened is revealed. [43] But as pointed out in R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388 at para 11, [2020] AJ No 1170 (QL): “... The existence of a fully aired out mistrial motion can be of considerable significance in determin......
  • R v Sidhu,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 10 Febrero 2021
    ...92 Alta LR (6th) 27; R v Hobbs, 2020 ABCA 156, para 31; R v Lundrigan, 2020 ABCA 281, paras 64-66, 11 Alta LR (7th) 309; R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388, para [34] An appellant who challenges the reliability of a verdict must show there is a real or reasonable probability that the trial outco......
  • R v Lundle,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 12 Enero 2023
    ...standard, with reference to the circumstances of this case at the time of trial and without benefit of hindsight: R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388, paras 15-18, 394 CCC (3d) 516; R v GDB, 2000 SCC 22, paras 26-29, [2000] 1 SCR 520; R v White, 2022 SCC 7, para 6, 411 CCC (3d) 419.  V. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT