R v Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice W.N. Renke |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 499 |
| Docket Number | 180262149Q1 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 31 August 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Saunders,
...[122] A very useful summary of the law is found in Justice Renke’s decision in R. v. Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499: [40] Section 8 of the Charter provides that “Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.” A search is reas......
-
R v M.G.,
...2013 BCCA 527 at para 25 [187] R v Arujo, 2000 SCC 65 at para 54 [188] R v Paryniuk, 2017 ONCA 87, at para’s 68-70, R v Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499 at para’s [189] See for example, R v Vivar, 2009 ONCA 433 at para 2, R v Phan, 2020 ONCA 298 at para’s 55-57, R v McElroy 2009 S......
-
R v Shivak,
...cellphone, after finding that his s 8 Charter rights had been breached when the phone was briefly searched upon his arrest: R v Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499 (the “Decision”). At the voir dire, Mr Shivak conceded that his arrest was lawful. The Crown conceded that the search by the ar......
3 cases
-
R. v. Saunders,
...[122] A very useful summary of the law is found in Justice Renke’s decision in R. v. Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499: [40] Section 8 of the Charter provides that “Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.” A search is reas......
-
R v M.G.,
...2013 BCCA 527 at para 25 [187] R v Arujo, 2000 SCC 65 at para 54 [188] R v Paryniuk, 2017 ONCA 87, at para’s 68-70, R v Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499 at para’s [189] See for example, R v Vivar, 2009 ONCA 433 at para 2, R v Phan, 2020 ONCA 298 at para’s 55-57, R v McElroy 2009 S......
-
R v Shivak,
...cellphone, after finding that his s 8 Charter rights had been breached when the phone was briefly searched upon his arrest: R v Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499 (the “Decision”). At the voir dire, Mr Shivak conceded that his arrest was lawful. The Crown conceded that the search by the ar......