R. v. Sillars, 2019 ONCJ 58
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Peter C. West |
| Citation | 2019 ONCJ 58 |
| Date | 01 February 2019 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 18-00265-00 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Steed, 2020 NSSC 86
...Petersen in the wiretap context, but the general principles remain applicable. [9] Cited often in Ontario – eg. Recently in R v Sillars, 2019 ONCJ 58 [10] DC Head noted that Sgt. Berger may very well have presumed that the facts of the March 29 search would also be included in the second [1......
-
R. v. Agnihotri, 2019 ONCJ 551
...ONCJ 499; R. v. Mazit, 2016 ONCJ 817. [4] R. v. Mawad, 2016 ONSC 7589. [5] R. v. Ruscia, 2019 ONSC 2442 at paras. 43-47; R . v. Sillars, 2019 ONCJ 58 at paras. [6] I also agree with Mr. Quilty’s observation that affording a detainee the opportunity to consult a duty counsel lawyer, w......
2 cases
-
R. v. Steed, 2020 NSSC 86
...Petersen in the wiretap context, but the general principles remain applicable. [9] Cited often in Ontario – eg. Recently in R v Sillars, 2019 ONCJ 58 [10] DC Head noted that Sgt. Berger may very well have presumed that the facts of the March 29 search would also be included in the second [1......
-
R. v. Agnihotri, 2019 ONCJ 551
...ONCJ 499; R. v. Mazit, 2016 ONCJ 817. [4] R. v. Mawad, 2016 ONSC 7589. [5] R. v. Ruscia, 2019 ONSC 2442 at paras. 43-47; R . v. Sillars, 2019 ONCJ 58 at paras. [6] I also agree with Mr. Quilty’s observation that affording a detainee the opportunity to consult a duty counsel lawyer, w......