R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611
| Judge | J.D. Rooke |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 611 |
| Docket Number | 130163405Q1 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 08 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547
...previously responded to this exact allegation in Ubah #4, but also that my record in relation to SRLs shows the opposite: R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras [57] The reasonable, well-informed, observer would also conclude that Mr. Ubah’s allegations are sometimes simply false in law. For e......
-
Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
...well-informed person would observe I have already responded to essentially identical and equally ungrounded complaints in R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras 24-36, 50-63, Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2019 ABQB 692 at paras 166-167, and Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limite......
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
...in different factual situations from the one at Bar, but setting out the applicable principles nonetheless: R. v. Stephan & Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611, at paras 19-31, 37-49, more generally at 79-85, and, in conclusion, at 95-6; Piikani Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 1......
-
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87
...for the substantive issue of recusal to proceed. [16] I have had occasion to deal with the law in such allegations in R. v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 [Stephan], although not in the same context, nor in the same level of vitriol (the Stephan case was more vitriolic). There, in paras 37 – 49, I o......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547
...previously responded to this exact allegation in Ubah #4, but also that my record in relation to SRLs shows the opposite: R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras [57] The reasonable, well-informed, observer would also conclude that Mr. Ubah’s allegations are sometimes simply false in law. For e......
-
Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
...well-informed person would observe I have already responded to essentially identical and equally ungrounded complaints in R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras 24-36, 50-63, Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2019 ABQB 692 at paras 166-167, and Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limite......
-
AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
...in different factual situations from the one at Bar, but setting out the applicable principles nonetheless: R. v. Stephan & Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611, at paras 19-31, 37-49, more generally at 79-85, and, in conclusion, at 95-6; Piikani Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 1......
-
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87
...for the substantive issue of recusal to proceed. [16] I have had occasion to deal with the law in such allegations in R. v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 [Stephan], although not in the same context, nor in the same level of vitriol (the Stephan case was more vitriolic). There, in paras 37 – 49, I o......
Request a trial to view additional results