R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611

JudgeJ.D. Rooke
Citation2019 ABQB 611
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number130163405Q1
Date08 August 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...previously responded to this exact allegation in Ubah #4, but also that my record in relation to SRLs shows the opposite: R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras [57] The reasonable, well-informed, observer would also conclude that Mr. Ubah’s allegations are sometimes simply false in law. For e......
  • Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 22, 2020
    ...well-informed person would observe I have already responded to essentially identical and equally ungrounded complaints in R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras 24-36, 50-63, Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2019 ABQB 692 at paras 166-167, and Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limite......
  • AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 19, 2021
    ...in different factual situations from the one at Bar, but setting out the applicable principles nonetheless: R. v. Stephan & Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611, at paras 19-31, 37-49, more generally at 79-85, and, in conclusion, at 95-6; Piikani Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 1......
  • Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 6, 2020
    ...for the substantive issue of recusal to proceed. [16] I have had occasion to deal with the law in such allegations in R. v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 [Stephan], although not in the same context, nor in the same level of vitriol (the Stephan case was more vitriolic). There, in paras 37 – 49, I o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...previously responded to this exact allegation in Ubah #4, but also that my record in relation to SRLs shows the opposite: R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras [57] The reasonable, well-informed, observer would also conclude that Mr. Ubah’s allegations are sometimes simply false in law. For e......
  • Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 22, 2020
    ...well-informed person would observe I have already responded to essentially identical and equally ungrounded complaints in R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 at paras 24-36, 50-63, Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2019 ABQB 692 at paras 166-167, and Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limite......
  • AR v JU, 2021 ABQB 127
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 19, 2021
    ...in different factual situations from the one at Bar, but setting out the applicable principles nonetheless: R. v. Stephan & Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611, at paras 19-31, 37-49, more generally at 79-85, and, in conclusion, at 95-6; Piikani Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 1......
  • Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 6, 2020
    ...for the substantive issue of recusal to proceed. [16] I have had occasion to deal with the law in such allegations in R. v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611 [Stephan], although not in the same context, nor in the same level of vitriol (the Stephan case was more vitriolic). There, in paras 37 – 49, I o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT