R. v. Tieu (D.), 2016 ABQB 344
| Judge | Tilleman, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | Tuesday June 28, 2016 |
| Citations | 2016 ABQB 344 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
22 practice notes
-
Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
...830 at paras 38-41, where the Court held that the oicers’ evidence did not rise above concerns of a general nature. See also R v Tieu , 2016 ABQB 344 at paras 70-74. 153 2018 ONCA 745. 154 Ibid at paras 29-34. 155 Ibid at para 32. However, in R v Leonard , 2020 ONCA 802 at para 13, the Cour......
-
Table of Cases
...33, 47, 49, 52-53, 57, 62, 320, 345-46 Thomsen , R v , 1988 CanLII 73 (SCC) ............................................ 329 Tieu , R v , 2016 ABQB 344 .................................................... 381 Tim , R v , 2022 SCC 12 ............. 12, 17, 80, 87, 155, 173-74, 177, 185, 250, ......
-
R. v. Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77
...that evidence is present and that the delay is required to prevent the imminent loss or imminent destruction of evidence: R. v. Tieu, 2016 ABQB 344, at paragraph ·      These exceptional circumstances which justify the suspension of the right to counsel signify......
-
R v Ha, 2018 ABCA 233
...occupants. [15] The Crown relies on R v Clayton, 2007 SCC 32 at para 48, [2007] 2 SCR 725 [Clayton], cited with approval in R v Tieu, 2016 ABQB 344 at para 97, 363 CRR (2d) 92, for the proposition that the objective element of the grounds to arrest can be established from any observations o......
Get Started for Free
21 cases
-
R. v. Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77
...that evidence is present and that the delay is required to prevent the imminent loss or imminent destruction of evidence: R. v. Tieu, 2016 ABQB 344, at paragraph · These exceptional circumstances which justify the suspension of the right to counsel signify......
-
R v Ha, 2018 ABCA 233
...occupants. [15] The Crown relies on R v Clayton, 2007 SCC 32 at para 48, [2007] 2 SCR 725 [Clayton], cited with approval in R v Tieu, 2016 ABQB 344 at para 97, 363 CRR (2d) 92, for the proposition that the objective element of the grounds to arrest can be established from any observations o......
-
2023 BCSC 158,
...a primary s. 10(b) breach analysis or a s. 24(2) analysis of the consequences of that breach should be rare. As stated in R. v. Tieu, 2016 ABQB 344: [62] The extraordinary or exigent circumstance justification under 10(b) is reserved for rare situations in which police have reasonable groun......
-
R v Cade, Ceal, and Whaling,
...a primary s. 10(b) breach analysis or a s. 24(2) analysis of the consequences of that breach should be rare. As stated in R. v. Tieu, 2016 ABQB 344: [62] The extraordinary or exigent circumstance justification under 10(b) is reserved for rare situations in which police have reasonable groun......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
...830 at paras 38-41, where the Court held that the oicers’ evidence did not rise above concerns of a general nature. See also R v Tieu , 2016 ABQB 344 at paras 70-74. 153 2018 ONCA 745. 154 Ibid at paras 29-34. 155 Ibid at para 32. However, in R v Leonard , 2020 ONCA 802 at para 13, the Cour......
-
Table of Cases
...33, 47, 49, 52-53, 57, 62, 320, 345-46 Thomsen , R v , 1988 CanLII 73 (SCC) ............................................ 329 Tieu , R v , 2016 ABQB 344 .................................................... 381 Tim , R v , 2022 SCC 12 ............. 12, 17, 80, 87, 155, 173-74, 177, 185, 250, ......