R v Van Deventer,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Jackson, Ryan-Froslie and Tholl JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKCA 163 |
| Citation | 2021 SKCA 163 |
| Date | 15 December 2021 |
| Docket Number | CACR3397 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v Lachance,
...error”: R v Thalheimer, 2022 SKCA 25 at para 56, 411 CCC (3d) 208. As Tholl J.A. emphasized in R v Van Deventer, 2021 SKCA 163, 407 CCC (3d) 291, “an appellate court…should not isolate problematic words or sentences and elevate their importance beyond that which th......
-
R v Lachance,
...as demonstrating error”: R v Thalheimer, 2022 SKCA 25 at para 56, 411 CCC (3d) 208. As Tholl J.A. emphasized in R v Van Deventer, 2021 SKCA 163, 407 CCC (3d) 291, “an appellate court…should not isolate problematic words or sentences and elevate their importance beyond t......
-
R. v. Baker,
...of inconsistent evidence from the accused: R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51 at para. 66; R. v. Van Deventer, 2021 SKCA 163 at paras. 20–21. A trial judge is not required to assess the accused’s credibility in isolation from the other evidence a......
-
HM the King v Brent O. Nerenberg,
...(D.) 1 case, and the issue was whether the Crown has proved the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. Counsel referred to R v Van Deventer, 2021 SKCA 163, 407 CCC (3d) 291 [ Van Deventer]. In that case, particularly at paragraph 24, the Court makes it clear that the trial judge cannot simply lo......
4 cases
-
R v Lachance,
...error”: R v Thalheimer, 2022 SKCA 25 at para 56, 411 CCC (3d) 208. As Tholl J.A. emphasized in R v Van Deventer, 2021 SKCA 163, 407 CCC (3d) 291, “an appellate court…should not isolate problematic words or sentences and elevate their importance beyond that which th......
-
R v Lachance,
...as demonstrating error”: R v Thalheimer, 2022 SKCA 25 at para 56, 411 CCC (3d) 208. As Tholl J.A. emphasized in R v Van Deventer, 2021 SKCA 163, 407 CCC (3d) 291, “an appellate court…should not isolate problematic words or sentences and elevate their importance beyond t......
-
R. v. Baker,
...of inconsistent evidence from the accused: R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51 at para. 66; R. v. Van Deventer, 2021 SKCA 163 at paras. 20–21. A trial judge is not required to assess the accused’s credibility in isolation from the other evidence a......
-
HM the King v Brent O. Nerenberg,
...(D.) 1 case, and the issue was whether the Crown has proved the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. Counsel referred to R v Van Deventer, 2021 SKCA 163, 407 CCC (3d) 291 [ Van Deventer]. In that case, particularly at paragraph 24, the Court makes it clear that the trial judge cannot simply lo......