R v Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352

JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf,The Honourable Madam Justice Elizabeth Hughes,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan
Citation2020 ABCA 352
Date02 October 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Docket Number1901-0368-A
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Parranto,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 12. November 2021
    ...376; R. v. Moriarty, 2016 ABPC 25, 34 Alta. L.R. (6th) 110; R. v. Boriskewich, 2017 ABPC 202, 62 Alta. L.R. (6th) 194; R. v. Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352; R. v. Roberts, 2020 ABCA 434, 17 Alta. L.R. (7th) 255; R. v. Morton, 2021 ABCA 29; R. v. Tran, 2010 ABCA 317, 490 A.R. 229; R. v. G.B., 2013......
  • R v Martineau,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 8. Dezember 2021
    ...R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 [Friesen] at para 26; R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at para 49; R v Roberts, 2020 ABCA 434 at para 29; R v Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352 at para [39]        Undoubtedly, Mr Martineau’s guilty plea was early. After he completed his asse......
  • R v Dyck,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19. November 2020
    ...weight to another, the trial judge exercises his or her discretion unreasonably”: Lacasse, para 49; Friesen, para 26; R v Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352, paras VI. Analysis 1. Weighing Aggravating Factors [18] Mr Dyck submits that the weighing of aggravating factors by the sentencing judge was in......
  • R v Mathers,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 7. Dezember 2021
    ...and the gravity of this offence requires some further inquiries. [52]        Regina v Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352, at paragraph 28, directs Courts must consider the objective risk of injury, the subjective awareness of the risk, whether a weapon was used, the......
4 cases
  • R. v. Parranto,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 12. November 2021
    ...376; R. v. Moriarty, 2016 ABPC 25, 34 Alta. L.R. (6th) 110; R. v. Boriskewich, 2017 ABPC 202, 62 Alta. L.R. (6th) 194; R. v. Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352; R. v. Roberts, 2020 ABCA 434, 17 Alta. L.R. (7th) 255; R. v. Morton, 2021 ABCA 29; R. v. Tran, 2010 ABCA 317, 490 A.R. 229; R. v. G.B., 2013......
  • R v Martineau,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 8. Dezember 2021
    ...R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 [Friesen] at para 26; R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at para 49; R v Roberts, 2020 ABCA 434 at para 29; R v Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352 at para [39]        Undoubtedly, Mr Martineau’s guilty plea was early. After he completed his asse......
  • R v Dyck,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19. November 2020
    ...weight to another, the trial judge exercises his or her discretion unreasonably”: Lacasse, para 49; Friesen, para 26; R v Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352, paras VI. Analysis 1. Weighing Aggravating Factors [18] Mr Dyck submits that the weighing of aggravating factors by the sentencing judge was in......
  • R v Mathers,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 7. Dezember 2021
    ...and the gravity of this offence requires some further inquiries. [52]        Regina v Wakefield, 2020 ABCA 352, at paragraph 28, directs Courts must consider the objective risk of injury, the subjective awareness of the risk, whether a weapon was used, the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT