R. v. Williams (W.), [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 184 (SC)

JudgeHill, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 07, 2010
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2010] O.T.C. Uned. 184 (SC);2010 ONSC 184;[2010] O.T.C. Uned. 184
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 practice notes
  • R. v. Liu (P.T.) et al., 2011 BCSC 1269
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 23, 2011
    ...in bulk or by the eight ball. This is simply too much to have on your possession at one time for personal use. [35] In R. v. Williams , 2010 ONSC 184 Hill J. wrote at paras 63-65: 63 Liability for the crime of trafficking, depending on the particular facts of a case, may be justified even w......
  • R. v. P.B,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 22, 2021
    ...whether the statements are credible and therefore worthy of belief. [120]     Hill, J. in the case of R. v. Williams 2010 ONSC 184 made the following observations respecting the assessment of credibility at para. A trier of fact, in assessing credibility, considers a var......
  • R. v. Brown, 2019 BCCA 393
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 11, 2019
    ...the totality of the evidence presented and not just the constituent parts: R. v. Ngo, 2009 BCCA 301, at paragraph 54; R. v. Williams, 2010 ONSC 184, at paragraph 65. One way of articulating that principle is to ask myself how likely it is that all of the incriminating evidence (in this case......
  • R. v. R.B., [2014] O.A.C. Uned. 660
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • October 20, 2014
    ...corroborating evidence. [17] In my view, this is a weak ground of appeal. [18] I note that the trial judge referred to R. v. Williams , 2010 ONSC 184, and explicitly instructed himself that the trial should not devolve into a credibility contest. In addition, he found that the case required......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • R. v. Liu (P.T.) et al., 2011 BCSC 1269
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 23, 2011
    ...in bulk or by the eight ball. This is simply too much to have on your possession at one time for personal use. [35] In R. v. Williams , 2010 ONSC 184 Hill J. wrote at paras 63-65: 63 Liability for the crime of trafficking, depending on the particular facts of a case, may be justified even w......
  • R. v. P.B,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 22, 2021
    ...whether the statements are credible and therefore worthy of belief. [120]     Hill, J. in the case of R. v. Williams 2010 ONSC 184 made the following observations respecting the assessment of credibility at para. A trier of fact, in assessing credibility, considers a var......
  • R. v. Brown, 2019 BCCA 393
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 11, 2019
    ...the totality of the evidence presented and not just the constituent parts: R. v. Ngo, 2009 BCCA 301, at paragraph 54; R. v. Williams, 2010 ONSC 184, at paragraph 65. One way of articulating that principle is to ask myself how likely it is that all of the incriminating evidence (in this case......
  • R. v. R.B., [2014] O.A.C. Uned. 660
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • October 20, 2014
    ...corroborating evidence. [17] In my view, this is a weak ground of appeal. [18] I note that the trial judge referred to R. v. Williams , 2010 ONSC 184, and explicitly instructed himself that the trial should not devolve into a credibility contest. In addition, he found that the case required......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT