R v Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Costigan,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 119 |
| Date | 24 March 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2003-0005-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R v Sidhu,
...jail term for a police officer who followed the victim and watched her at her residence for several months); The Queen v. Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119 (the Court upheld a nine-month jail term with two years’ probation for a twenty-three year old female who pleaded guilty to criminal harassmen......
-
R v Sidhu, 2020 ABPC 197
...9 and 24 months, which includes imprisonment and probation. This was confirmed in a recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision in R v Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119. In that case, Ms. Wowk received 9 months for criminal harassment and 3 months consecutive for impersonating a peace officer, followed by a ......
-
R v HPM,
...months, and the Crown proposes a sentence within the range of 12 to 18 months. According to the Court of Appeal of Alberta, in R v Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119 at para 31, the appropriate sentencing range for criminal harassment is 9 to 24 months’ imprisonment. [133] &#......
-
R v Soosay,
...circumstances, this simply points to the absence of a mitigating factor. See R v Ledesma, 2019 ABQB 204, Gates J at para 74; R v Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119 at paras 23 and [97] As regards this factor, I accept Defence counsel’s submission that Mr. S......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R v Sidhu,
...jail term for a police officer who followed the victim and watched her at her residence for several months); The Queen v. Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119 (the Court upheld a nine-month jail term with two years’ probation for a twenty-three year old female who pleaded guilty to criminal harassmen......
-
R v Sidhu, 2020 ABPC 197
...9 and 24 months, which includes imprisonment and probation. This was confirmed in a recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision in R v Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119. In that case, Ms. Wowk received 9 months for criminal harassment and 3 months consecutive for impersonating a peace officer, followed by a ......
-
R v HPM,
...months, and the Crown proposes a sentence within the range of 12 to 18 months. According to the Court of Appeal of Alberta, in R v Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119 at para 31, the appropriate sentencing range for criminal harassment is 9 to 24 months’ imprisonment. [133] &#......
-
R v Soosay,
...circumstances, this simply points to the absence of a mitigating factor. See R v Ledesma, 2019 ABQB 204, Gates J at para 74; R v Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119 at paras 23 and [97] As regards this factor, I accept Defence counsel’s submission that Mr. S......
Request a trial to view additional results