R. v. Wright, (1991) 1 B.C.A.C. 79 (CA)

JudgeLambert, Macfarlane and Proudfoot, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Case DateJune 05, 1991
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations(1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 79 (CA)

R. v. Wright (1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 79 (CA);

    1 W.A.C. 79

MLB headnote and full text

Regina (respondent) v. Douglas Paul Wright (appellant)

(No. V01324)

Indexed As: R. v. Wright

British Columbia Court of Appeal

Lambert, Macfarlane and Proudfoot, JJ.A.

June 5, 1991.

Summary:

The accused pleaded guilty to possession of a narcotic for the purpose of trafficking contrary to s. 4(2) of the Narcotic Control Act and was sentenced to imprisonment for two years less a day. The accused appealed against sentence.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

Criminal Law - Topic 5850

Sentence - Possession of narcotic (cocaine) for purpose of trafficking - A 37 year old drug addict was found in possession of 6.5 grams of cocaine and $1,470 in cash and other indicia of the drug trade - The accused had just been released from prison on a similar conviction and was still on probation - The accused had never been gainfully employed - The British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed the accused's appeal from a sentence of imprisonment for two years less a day.

Statutes Noticed:

Narcotic Control Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N-1, sect. 4(2) [para. 1].

Counsel:

Will Geselbracht, for the respondent;

  E. Keith Jones, for the appellant.

This appeal was heard before Lambert, Macfarlane and Proudfoot, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal.

On June 5, 1991, Proudfoot, J.A., delivered the following judgment orally for the Court of Appeal.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • R. v. Basaraba (L.M.), (2000) 140 B.C.A.C. 6 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 10, 2000
    ...223 (C.A.), consd. [para. 4]. R. v. Meilleur (M.J.) (1998), 113 B.C.A.C. 164; 184 W.A.C. 164 (C.A.), consd. [para. 5]. R. v. Wright (1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 79; 1 W.A.C. 79 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; 194 N.R. 321; 73 B.C.A.C. 81; 120 W.A.C. 81; 105 C.C.C.(3d) 327, ......
1 cases
  • R. v. Basaraba (L.M.), (2000) 140 B.C.A.C. 6 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 10, 2000
    ...223 (C.A.), consd. [para. 4]. R. v. Meilleur (M.J.) (1998), 113 B.C.A.C. 164; 184 W.A.C. 164 (C.A.), consd. [para. 5]. R. v. Wright (1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 79; 1 W.A.C. 79 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; 194 N.R. 321; 73 B.C.A.C. 81; 120 W.A.C. 81; 105 C.C.C.(3d) 327, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT