R. v. Wruck (S.L.), 2016 ABQB 370
| Judge | Shelley, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE |
| Citation | 2016 ABQB 370 |
| Date | 12 July 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R. v. Wentworth,
...that I can conduct this trial without improperly using any bad character evidence that has been adduced. As noted in R. v. Wruck, 2016 ABQB 370, at para. 26, “in these circumstances, the prejudicial effect of the statements is ameliorated by my understanding of the prohibition agains......
-
R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117
...reason may be that courts have recognized that judge-alone trials significantly reduce the risks of the prejudicial evidence: R v Wruck, 2016 ABQB 370 at para 25; Magoon, aff’d on this point 2016 ABCA 412 at para 58; R v Hales, 2014 SKQB 411 at para 141; Streiling at para 19. Thus, i......
-
R v Wruck, 2020 ABCA 270
...and arrested the appellant the next day on charges of first-degree murder. Reasons in the Court Below Voir dire Ruling (R v Wruck, 2016 ABQB 370) [14] On July 12, 2016, the trial judge issued her Reasons for Decision in the voir dire on the admissibility of statements made by the appellant ......
-
R v Seien,
...bans. [10] I found the recent decision of Madame Justice Shelley in R v Jennings, 2018 ABQB 103 helpful and her decision in R v Wruck, 2016 ABQB 370 tangentially relevant. Mr. Justice Burrows’ decision in R v NRR, 2013 ABQB 302 was also of assistance. [11] Prior to the addition of s. 486.31......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R. v. Wentworth,
...that I can conduct this trial without improperly using any bad character evidence that has been adduced. As noted in R. v. Wruck, 2016 ABQB 370, at para. 26, “in these circumstances, the prejudicial effect of the statements is ameliorated by my understanding of the prohibition agains......
-
R v Wruck, 2020 ABCA 270
...and arrested the appellant the next day on charges of first-degree murder. Reasons in the Court Below Voir dire Ruling (R v Wruck, 2016 ABQB 370) [14] On July 12, 2016, the trial judge issued her Reasons for Decision in the voir dire on the admissibility of statements made by the appellant ......
-
R v Ledesma, 2020 ABQB 117
...reason may be that courts have recognized that judge-alone trials significantly reduce the risks of the prejudicial evidence: R v Wruck, 2016 ABQB 370 at para 25; Magoon, aff’d on this point 2016 ABCA 412 at para 58; R v Hales, 2014 SKQB 411 at para 141; Streiling at para 19. Thus, i......
-
R v Seien,
...bans. [10] I found the recent decision of Madame Justice Shelley in R v Jennings, 2018 ABQB 103 helpful and her decision in R v Wruck, 2016 ABQB 370 tangentially relevant. Mr. Justice Burrows’ decision in R v NRR, 2013 ABQB 302 was also of assistance. [11] Prior to the addition of s. 486.31......
Request a trial to view additional results