RAPP v. BAUMANN, 2018 SKQB 134
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | BROWN J. |
Citation | 2018 SKQB 134 |
Docket Number | FLD 157 of 2009 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Date | 01 May 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Digest: Rapp v Baumann, 2018 SKQB 134
...as: 2018 SKQB 134 Docket Number: QB17520 , FLD 157/09 JCR Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-05-01 Judges: Brown Subjects: Family Law � Spousal Support Family Law � Family Property � Evaluation Digest: The parties began living together in August 2003. The petitioner moved to the dairy......
-
S.B. v T.B.,
...by T.B.’s appraiser. [36] S.B.’s reliance on Rapp v Bauman, 2018 SKQB 134 [Rapp], for the proposition that, because he was in operational control and solely responsible for the success and risk of the business, the da......
-
Dungey v Dungey,
...Ackerman v Ackerman, 2014 SKCA 137, [2015] 6 WWR 626 [Ackerman]; Thomas v Thomas, 2016 SKCA 53, [2016] 9 WWR 1 [Thomas]; Rapp v Baumann, 2018 SKQB 134; and Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195, for guidance with regard to choice of valuation date. [17] The trial judge determined market forces wer......
-
RAPP v. BAUMANN, 2019 SKQB 211
...COMMENTS \* Lower for the petitioner James J. Vogel, Q.C. for the respondent SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS TO THE BROWN J. MAY 1, 2018 JUDGMENT [2018 SKQB 134] AUGUST 27, 2019 xe Judge Introduction [1] The parties apply for: 1) confirmation of the calculations performed by Marc Hoffort regarding cer......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
S.B. v T.B.,
...by T.B.’s appraiser. [36] S.B.’s reliance on Rapp v Bauman, 2018 SKQB 134 [Rapp], for the proposition that, because he was in operational control and solely responsible for the success and risk of the business, the da......
-
Dungey v Dungey,
...Ackerman v Ackerman, 2014 SKCA 137, [2015] 6 WWR 626 [Ackerman]; Thomas v Thomas, 2016 SKCA 53, [2016] 9 WWR 1 [Thomas]; Rapp v Baumann, 2018 SKQB 134; and Kormos v Kormos, 2018 SKQB 195, for guidance with regard to choice of valuation date. [17] The trial judge determined market forces wer......
-
RAPP v. BAUMANN, 2019 SKQB 211
...COMMENTS \* Lower for the petitioner James J. Vogel, Q.C. for the respondent SUPPLEMENTAL REASONS TO THE BROWN J. MAY 1, 2018 JUDGMENT [2018 SKQB 134] AUGUST 27, 2019 xe Judge Introduction [1] The parties apply for: 1) confirmation of the calculations performed by Marc Hoffort regarding cer......
-
DUNGEY v DUNGEY, 2019 SKQB 34
...title="Saskatchewan Reports">(1994), 120 Sask R 17 at paras 33-34, and Ackerman at para 37. [40] In Rapp v Baumann, 2018 SKQB 134, the Court came to a similar conclusion where the change in value of the company was attributed to the capacity of the respondent to manage the business rather t......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Rapp v Baumann, 2018 SKQB 134
...as: 2018 SKQB 134 Docket Number: QB17520 , FLD 157/09 JCR Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-05-01 Judges: Brown Subjects: Family Law � Spousal Support Family Law � Family Property � Evaluation Digest: The parties began living together in August 2003. The petitioner moved to the dairy......