Reducing environmental uncertainty: How high performance work systems moderate the resource dependence‐firm performance relationship
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1412 |
Date | 01 June 2018 |
Published date | 01 June 2018 |
Reducing environmental uncertainty: How high
performance work systems moderate the resource
dependence-firm performance relationship
Josh Bendickson*
East Carolina University
Furkan A. Gur
Northern Illinois University
Erik C. Taylor
Louisiana State University
Abstract
Firm performance is a major concern for all organizations
and involves a multitude of antecedents. Reducing environ-
mental uncertainty and dependency through the use of
strategic actions in the resource dependency theory (RDT)
framework and enhancing work practices through high
performance work systems (HPWS) lead to higher levels of
firm performance. We reveal the interconnectivity between
RDT and HPWS and develop propositions as to how
components of HPWS positively moderate the relationship
between firm performance and the environmental
uncertainty-reducing strategic actions proposed by RDT
such as mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, boards of
directors, political action, and executive succession. Copy-
right © 2016 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: environmental uncertainty, high performance
work systems (HPWS), human capital, resource dependency
theory (RDT)
Résumé
La performance de l’entreprise préoccupe au plus haut point
les organisations et repose sur une multitude de facteurs. La
réduction de l’incertitude environnementale et de la dépen-
dance à travers des actions stratégiques entreprises dans
le cadre de la théorie de la dépendance envers les ressources
(RDT) et l’amélioration des pratiques professionnelles à
travers les systèmes de travail hautement performants
(HPWS) entraînent des niveaux élevés de performance.
Nous montrons l’interdépendance entre le RDT et le HPWS
et formulons des propositions pour expliquer comment les
composants du HPWS modèrent positivement la relation
entre d’une part la performance de l’entreprise et d’autre
part l’incertitude environnementale et la réduction des
actions stratégiques proposées par la RDT. Ces actions sont,
entre autres, les fusions et les acquisitions, les coentreprises,
les conseils d’administration, les actions politiques et la
relève des cadres. Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés : incertitude environnementale, systèmes de tra-
vail hautement performants (HPWS), capital humain, théorie
de la dépendance envers les ressources (RDT)
In their seminal statement of resource dependence
theory (RDT), Pfeffer and Salancik (1978) argued that firms
are dependent on external resources as well as the other
actors in the environment that impact and control those
resources to achieve their goals. Yet, these other organiza-
tions are motivated by diverse interests and objectives, giv-
ing rise to uncertainty in the environment that increases the
difficulty in attaining critical resources and maintaining via-
bility. RDTasserts that the main task of organizational man-
agement is to build and maintain a coalition to manage this
environmental uncertainty and ensure the continued support
and survival of the organization (Pfeffer & Salancik, 1978).
However, research in the field of RDT has stalled and fre-
quently been referred to as a metaphor for organizational ac-
tivity (Pfeffer, 2003) and a ceremonial cite used to
acknowledge the presence and influence of external uncer-
tainty and influence (Wry, Cobb, & Aldrich, 2013) despite
its still-present potential to explain important organizational
phenomena.
*Please address correspondence to: Josh Bendickson, B.I. Moody III
College of Business Administration, University of Louisiana at Lafayette,
Lafayette, Louisiana. Email: jxb3925@louisiana.edu
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de l'administration
35: 252–264 (2018)
Published online 9 November 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1412
Can J Adm Sci
35(2), 252–264 (2018)Copyright © 2016 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 252
To continue reading
Request your trial